|
|
|
| home | your council |
business | community | education | environment & waste |
leisure & tourism |
roads & transport |
social care |
|
Part 5A(1) - Members Planning Code of Good Practice
|
Part 5A(1) - Members' Planning Code of Good PracticeContentsBackground
Introduction 1 Relationship to the Members’ Code of Conduct 2 Development Proposals and Interests under the Members’ Code of Conduct 3 Fettering Discretion in the Planning Process 4 Contact with Applicants, Developers and Objectors 5 Lobbying of Councillors 6 Lobbying by Councillors 7 Site Visits 8 Pre-Meetings 9 Public Speaking at Meetings 10 Officers 11 Decision Making 12 Members Awareness This Code of Good Practice has been based on a model produced by the Association of Council Secretaries and Solicitors which was prepared in response to the Local Government Association’s Guidance Note on the preparation of Local Codes of Good Practice on Planning Matters in the light of the introduction of the new ethical framework and in consultation with the District Audit Service, Local Government Ombudsman and the Standards Board for England.
The aim of this code of good practice: to ensure that in the planning process there are no grounds for suggesting that a decision has been biased, partial or not well founded in any way.
The key purpose of Planning: to regulate the development and use of land in the public interest.
Your role as a Member of a Planning Authority: to make planning decisions openly, impartially, with sound judgement and for justifiable reasons.
When the Code of Good Practice applies: this code applies to Members at all times when involving themselves in the planning process. This includes both decision making meetings of the Council when exercising the functions of the Planning Authority and less formal occasions, such as meetings with officers or the public and consultative meetings. It applies to planning enforcement matters or site specific policy issues as well as to planning applications.
If you have any doubts about the application of this Code to your own circumstances you should seek advice early, from the Monitoring Officer or one of his or her staff, and preferably well before any meeting takes place.
Do apply the rules in the Members’ Code of Conduct first, which must always be complied with.
Do then apply the rules in this Planning Code of Good Practice, which seek to explain and supplement the Members’ Code of Conduct for the purposes of planning control. If you do not abide by this Code of Good Practice, you may put:
Do disclose the existence and nature of your interest at any relevant meeting, including informal meetings or discussions with officers and other Members. Preferably, disclose your interest at the beginning of the meeting and not just at the commencement of discussion on that particular matter. (You can use the attached form for disclosing interests.)
Do then act accordingly. Where your interest is personal and prejudicial:-
Don’t fetter your discretion by making up your mind, or appearing to have made up your mind on how you will vote on any planning matter prior to formal consideration of the matter at the meeting of the planning authority or prior to hearing the officer’s presentation and evidence and arguments on both sides. This is particularly important if you are contacted by an external interest or lobby group.
If you have done so then you will not be able to participate in the determination of the matter at the Board because if you did take part in the discussion or vote it would put the County Council at risk in a number of ways.
Firstly it would probably in the view of the Local Government Ombudsman constitute maladministration.
Secondly, the Council could be at risk of legal proceedings on a number of possible grounds
Do be aware you are likely to be considered to have fettered your discretion where the Council is the landowner, developer or applicant and you have been involved to such an extent in the preparation, submission or advocacy of a planning proposal on behalf of the Council as to make your participation in the decision-making process inappropriate.
Do also be aware that, although the Members’ Code of Conduct provides for a presumption that you may regard yourself as not having a prejudicial interest in matters which relate to the following organisations:
you must decide in relation to any planning proposal, whether you have been involved to such an extent in the preparation, submission or advocacy of a planning proposal on behalf of the body as to make your participation in the decision making process inappropriate.
If you have then you should always disclose a prejudicial as well as a personal interest and withdraw.
Do consider yourself able to take part in the debate on a proposal when acting as part of a consultee body (ie where you are also a member of the district/borough council as well as being a County Councillor), provided:
(i) your views are expressed on the limited information before you only;
(ii) that you will reserve judgement and the independence to make up your own mind on each separate proposal when it comes before the determining body, based on your overriding duty to the whole community and not just to the people in your ward, and you hear all of the relevant information;
(iii) you will not in any way commit yourself as to how you or others may vote when the proposal comes before the determining body; and
(iv) you disclose the personal interest regarding your membership of the consultee body or role when the determining body comes to consider the proposal.
However if you decide to stay explain that you do not intend to speak and vote because you have or you could reasonably be perceived as having judged the matter elsewhere, so that this may be recorded in the minutes. Use the disclosure form provided for disclosing interests.
If you are a local member whose Division is directly affected by the application:
Do consider whether you should take the opportunity to exercise your separate speaking rights as a Local Member subject to the consent of the Chairman of the Board under Meeting Procedure Rule 34 where you have represented your views or those of local electors and fettered your discretion, but do not have a personal and prejudicial interest. Where you do:
Do refer an applicant, developer or objector who approaches you about a planning application to officers for planning, procedural or technical advice.
Don’t agree to any meeting with applicants, developers or groups of objectors where it can be avoided. Where you feel that a formal meeting would be useful in clarifying the issues, you should never seek to arrange that meeting yourself as this may be seen as your promoting one point of view or the other. Request the Director of Community Services to organise it. The officers will then ensure that those present at the meeting are advised from the start that the discussions will not bind the authority to any particular course of action, that the meeting is properly recorded on the application file and the record of the meeting is disclosed when the application is considered by the Board.
Do remember to:
In addition in respect of presentations by applicants/developers:
Do remember to
LobbyingLobbying is an area with which many Members have a great deal of difficulty. Lobbying in respect of other aspects of their work as a Councillor is commonplace and is an accepted part of the democratic process. However if such lobbying of Members of a planning committee oversteps the mark it can lead, unless care is taken, to the impartiality and integrity of Members being called into question. It is essential that a Member bears in mind that he/she has an overriding duty to the whole community not just the people in his/her division. This can be especially difficult for the 'patch' member who is also a Member of the Board. Therefore special considerations apply when lobbying of and by Members occurs during the consideration of a planning application.
The safest advice would be for a Councillor who is a Member of the Board not to place him/herself in a position where lobbying can occur. If that cannot be achieved, and frequently it will not be possible to do this, then:
Unless you have a personal and prejudicial interest in the matter, if you follow this and the other advice in this Code, you will be able to speak and vote at the Board meeting.
In this context:
Lobbying is asking fellow Councillors to hear or share one’s thoughts and concerns on an issue.
Excessive lobbying is applying such pressure on a fellow Councillor that it amounts to an attempt to obtain a commitment as to how that Member will vote (whether spoken or unspoken). Pressure of this sort is an attempt to pre-determine the outcome of the issue (making the decision potentially unlawful) and may also amount to the Member using their position improperly to confer an advantage or disadvantage (breaching paragraph 5(a) of the County Council’s Members’ Code of Conduct).
It may be difficult to determine when lobbying becomes "excessive" and it may only become apparent to the world at large (objectively) as an outcome. In view of this if you approach a fellow Councillor on a planning application:
Do be mindful that another Councillor may feel under undue pressure more readily in the following situations:
Do always be clear that your lobbying is to solicit interest only and is not to solicit a voting commitment
Do cease to lobby a Member if it appears there is a risk that the Member will feel subject to pressure as to how he/she votes
Don’t lead or act as spokesperson of an organisation whose primary purpose is to lobby or promote or oppose a planning application. This does not preclude you from joining general interest groups which reflect your areas of interest and which concentrate on issues beyond particular planning applications eg The Victorian Society, The Ramblers, CPRE or a local civic society. You should however make sure that you declare a personal interest when the matter is discussed.
Don’t discuss how to vote on a planning proposal at a political group meeting or lobby other Councillors to do so. The Ombudsman has made it clear that in his view the use of political whips to determine planning applications could amount to maladministration.
Don’t put pressure on a planning officer for a particular recommendation as this may be seen as prejudicing his/her professional integrity and impartiality
Do attend site visits organised by the Council.
Do ensure that any information which you gained from the site visit is reported back to the Board, so that all Members have the same information
Do ensure that you treat the site visit only as an opportunity to seek information and to observe the site.
Do ask the officers at the site visit questions or seek clarification from them on factual matters which are relevant to the site inspection.
Don’t express opinions or views on the proposal to anyone.
Don’t enter a site which is subject to a proposal other than as part of an official site visit, even in response to an invitation, as this may give the impression of bias unless:
Briefing meetings for the Chairman and Spokesmen of the Board are held to facilitate the smooth running of the Board Meeting. Discussion will be limited to procedural issues such as the organisation of site visits, arrangements for members of the public to exercise their speaking rights at the meeting and to ensure all relevant paperwork and information is available for the meeting. This information can be used by the Chairman and Spokesmen to brief their colleagues at group meetings in advance of the formal meeting.
Don’t discuss the determination of applications at either briefing meetings or group meetings.
Do use pre-meetings to resolve procedural issues to facilitate the smooth running of the formal meeting.
Don’t ever use the political whip on a planning matter. This would leave the decision open to challenge and could give rise to a finding of maladministration by the Local Government Ombudsman.
Don’t allow members of the public to communicate with you before or during the Board’s proceedings (orally or in writing) other than through the scheme for public speaking, as this may give the appearance of bias.
Don’t put pressure on officers to put forward a particular recommendation. This does not prevent you from asking questions or submitting views to the Director of Community Services which may be incorporated into any committee report.
Do recognise that officers are part of a management structure and only discuss a proposal, outside of any arranged meeting, with a Head of Service or those officers who are authorised by their Head of Service to deal with the proposal at a Member level.
Do recognise and respect that officers involved in the processing and determination of planning matters must act in accordance with any appropriate officer and professional codes of conduct, primarily the Royal Town Planning Institute’s Code of Professional Conduct. As a result, planning officers’ views, opinions and recommendations will be presented on the basis of their overriding obligation of professional independence, which may on occasion be at odds with the views, opinions or decisions of Members.
Do come to meetings with an open mind and demonstrate that you are open-minded.
Do make decisions in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.
Do come to your decision only after due consideration of all of the information reasonably required upon which to base a decision. If you feel there is insufficient time to digest new information or that there is simply insufficient information before you, request that further information. If necessary, defer or refuse the application.
Don’t vote or take part in the decision on a proposal unless you have been present to hear everything that has been said at that meeting, including the officers’ introduction to the matter.
Do make sure that if you are proposing, seconding or supporting a decision (especially one contrary to officer recommendations or the development plan) that you clearly identify and understand the planning reasons leading to this conclusion/decision. These reasons must be given prior to the vote and be recorded. Be aware that you may have to justify the resulting decision by giving evidence in the event of any challenge.
The planning system is a quasi judicial process involving complex legal and technical issues which require the application of sound judgement in the assessment of planning proposals. A failure to follow proper practice and procedures can lead to serious consequences for the planning authority. Therefore:
Do endeavour to participate in any sessions provided to raise awareness on planning matters and this Code of Good Practice which will assist you in carrying out your role properly and effectively.
It would not be appropriate for Members who have not attended these sessions to be involved in determining planning proposals.
The County Council’s Code of Conduct requires elected members and co-opted members to disclose the existence and nature of any personal interests at the commencement of that consideration or when the interest becomes apparent. In practice this is usually done at the beginning of the meeting concerned under a specific agenda item entitled ‘Declarations of Interest’.
The Members’ Planning Code of Good Practice adopted by the Council also requires members to disclose where members consider they may have fettered their discretion on a particular planning matter.
A form has been prepared to assist members in declaring such matters.
[end of Part 5A(1)]
|
||
|