|
Outcomes
|
Indicators
|
Target Yr 1
|
Target Yr 2
|
Target Yr 3
|
Reward Stretch Target Yes/No
|
Lead & Delivery Partners
|
Cross Cutting Link
|
|
1. To reduce overall crime particularly violent crime, domestic violence and hate crime.
|
BCS Comparator Crime. Categories measured to comply with the SSCF agreements till 2008. (Baseline Year 2003/04 as per the agreement on BCS targets with the Home Office. Baseline = 27956 BCS Comparator Crimes.)
|
To reduce BCS Comparator Crime by 17.1% by 31st March 2008 Projected target at 31st March 2007=24538
|
To reduce BCS Comparator Crime by 17.1% by 31st March 2008 Projected target at 31st March 2008=23171
|
To be negotiated during the period October 2007- March 2008
|
No
|
Ch Supt Evans All LAA Partners
|
All Blocks
|
|
|
1.2 i) The number of reported domestic violence incidents. (Baseline Data 2005/6 estimated at 5887 per annum)
|
Without Reward
i) To maintain the current level of performance With Reward i) To increase by 5% the number of domestic violence incidents reported to the police in a year by March 2009
|
Without Reward
i) To maintain the current level of performance With Reward i) To increase by 5% the number of domestic violence incidents reported to the police in a year by March 2009
|
Without Reward
5887 With Reward
6187
|
Yes +300 reports
|
Ch Supt Evans All LAA Partners
|
|
|
|
ii) The percentage of detected Domestic Violence Crimes committed by repeat offenders in the last twelve months (Baseline Data 2005/6 estimated at 30% (512) of detected DV crimes committed by repeat offenders pr annum)
|
To reduce by a third the percentage of Domestic Violence offences committed by repeat offenders in the last twelve months. by March 2009
|
To reduce by a third the percentage of Domestic Violence offences committed by repeat offenders in the last twelve months. by March 2009
|
Without reward
30% (538) With reward 20% (358)
|
Yes Reduction of 10 percentage points in rate of detected DV crimes committed by repeat offenders (i.e. 33% fewer detected DV crimes committed by repeat offenders) (Est.180 offences)
|
Ch Supt Evans All LAA Partners
|
|
|
|
1.3 i) To increase the reporting of Hate crime in Leicestershire in years 1 and 2 ii) To reduce reported Hate Crime in year 3. (Baseline data to be established in April - Oct 2006. Current performance 494 incidents reported to the police per annum.)
|
i) To create a new measurement regime and baseline the indicator during the period April –October 2006. Then to increase the reporting of hate crime
|
I)To increase the reporting of hate crime the target set in year one.
|
ii)To reduce the number hate crimes by a target set in year 2.
|
No
|
Ch Supt Evans All LAA Partners
|
|
|
2. a)To reduce the level of offending by prolific offenders.
|
2.1 The number of offences committed by prolific and other priority offenders subject to intensive supervision. (Baseline data to be collated as the cohorts of offenders are identified Cohort 1 Offenders entering the scheme between 01/04/2006 and 30/09/2006 Cohort 2 Offenders entering the scheme between 1/04/2007 and 30/09/2007) Baselines 30.10.2006 & 31.10.2007
|
Without Reward
To reduce offending by adult PPO’s in cohort 1 by 5.7% With Reward To reduce offending by adult PPO’s in cohort 1 by 18.7%
|
Without Reward
To continue to reduce offending by adult PPO’s in cohort 1 and 2 by 5.7% . With Reward To continue to reduce offending by adult PPO’s in cohort 1 and 2 by 18.7%
|
Without Reward
To continue to reduce offending by adult PPO’s in cohorts 2by 5.7% With Reward To continue to reduce offending by adult PPO’s in cohort 2 by 18.7%
|
Yes Enhancement 13 percentage points on each cohort
|
Paul Hindson MAPPOM Partners
|
ED, H
|
|
2 b) To reduce the overall levels of crime by reducing offending by prolific offenders.
|
2.2 The number of Police recorded common PPO crimes in Leicestershire: Crime types with 2003/2004 Baselines i) Theft of Motor Vehicle 2151 ii) Theft From Motor Vehicle 5070 iii) Domestic Burglary 3290 iv) Theft From Person 544 v) Personal Robbery 253
|
Without Reward
To reduce common recorded PPO Crime by the following by 31st March 2008 by the following i) Theft of Motor Vehicle 1448 ii) Theft From Motor Vehicle 3417 iii) Domestic Burglary 2535 iv) Theft From Person 482 v) Personal Robbery 241 With Reward To reduce common recorded PPO Crime by the following by 31st March 2008 by the following I) Theft of Motor Vehicle 1405 Theft From Motor Vehicle 3316 Domestic Burglary 2470 Theft From Person 472 Personal Robbery 236
|
Without Reward
To reduce common recorded PPO Crime by the following by 31st March 2008 by the following i) Theft of Motor Vehicle 1448 ii) Theft From Motor Vehicle 3417 iii) Domestic Burglary 2535 iv) Theft From Person 482 v) Personal Robbery 241 With Reward To reduce common recorded PPO Crime by the following by 31st March 2008 by the following i) Theft of Motor Vehicle 1405 ii)Theft From Motor Vehicle 3316 iii)Domestic Burglary 2470 iv)Theft From Person 472 v)Personal Robbery 236
|
|
Yes Motor vehicle 43 Theft from motor vehicle 101 Domestic Burglary 66 Theft from Person 11 Personal Robbery 5
|
Paul Hindson MAPPOM Partners
|
|
|
3. To build respect in communities and reduce the level of anti-social behaviour.
|
3.1 The level of recorded Anti-Social Behaviour based on a common recording system. (Baseline data to be established by 31st March 2007)
|
To develop the Common recording system and baseline the data. Then set an appropriate reduction target
|
To reduce ASB by the target set in Yr 1
|
To reduce ASB by the target set in Yr 1
|
No
|
Supt Smith All LAA Partners
|
SC, CG
|
|
4. To reduce the harm caused by illegal drugs and alcohol misuse both to communities and to individuals and their families.
|
4.1 The percentage of problematic drug users in treatment. Baseline data 2959 problematic drug users and in 2004/05 31% were in treatment. Current estimates for 2005/06 are on target for 38% in treatment.
|
a) To increase the percentage of problematic drug users in treatment to 49%
|
To increase the percentage of problematic drug users in treatment to 65%
|
To increase the percentage of problematic drug users in treatment to (Figure to be agreed)
|
No
|
Debra Cunningham DAAT Partners
|
H, CYP, CG
|
|
|
4.2 To increase the number of seizures for class A drugs. (Base line 2005/6 actual figures available in April 2006)
|
To increase the number of seizures for Class A drugs beyond the level recorded in the year 2005/2006
|
To increase the number of seizures for Class A drugs beyond the level recorded in Yr 1
|
To increase the number of seizures for Class A drugs beyond the level recorded in Yr 2
|
No
|
Debra Cunningham DAAT Partners
|
|
|
|
4.3 The harm caused to the community by alcohol misuse. (Baseline data to be set during year and in place by 31st March 2007)
|
To define measures of the “Harm caused to Communities” To create a new measurement regime and baseline the indicator. Then set implementation targets for subsequent years
|
To reduce the harm caused to the community by alcohol use, by the target set for this year in Yr1
|
To reduce the harm caused to the community by alcohol use, by the target set for this year in Yr1
|
No
|
Debra Cunningham DAAT Partners
|
C&YP ED, HC
|
|
5. To provide improved life chances and better opportunities for young people in order to prevent offending and re-offending by children and young people, including the prevention of future prolific offenders. (Shared outcome with Children and Young People’s Block)
|
5.1The number of first time entrants to the youth justice system. The target is a year on year reduction and therefore the baseline for year 1 has to be set at the end of 2005/06. Current projection for 2005/06 is 1,276 first time entrants (based on date to end December 2005)
|
To reduce the number of first time entrants to the youth Justice system by 2% by March 2007
|
To reduce the number of first time entrants to the youth Justice system by 2% by March 2008
|
To reduce the number of first time entrants to the youth Justice system by 2% by March 2009
|
No
|
Phil Hawkins All LAA Partners
|
CYP, ED, HC
|
|
|
5.2 The percentage of young people prevented from further offending after receiving a reprimand. Note: This will be measured in two cohorts: Those receiving reprimands between 01/04/06 and 30/06/06(Cohort 1) and between 01/04/07 and 30/06/07 (Cohort 2) The aim is to achieve an increase in the percentage prevented from further offending in Cohort 2 – as measured at 30th June 2009. (Baseline prevented from further offending set in 2003 is 64%)
|
Increase the percentage prevented from further offending by 6% by March 2009 (from 64% to 70%) (See Note in Indicator column)
|
Increase the percentage prevented from further offending by 6% by March 2009 (from 64% to 70%) (See Note in Indicator column)
|
Increase the percentage prevented from further offending by 6% by March 2009 (from 64% to 70%) (See Note in Indicator column)
|
This is one of 4 indicators which make up a vulnerable children reward target within the C&YP Block. This indicator will therefore be measured under the C&YP Block. Another of the 4 indicators is to increase the number of young people completing drug and alcohol treatment programmes which also directly supports Outcome 4 above
|
Phil Hawkins All LAA Partners
|
C&YP ED HC
|
|
6. To Reassure the public, Reducing the Fear of Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour and improve the confidence in the criminal justice system
|
6.1 The percentage of people who have a high level of worry about becoming a victim of crime is lower than the baseline year (2002/03) (Baseline data 2002-03
Violence 20.6% Vehicle 16.6% Burglary 14.7%)
|
Inline with government set reduction targets (07/08) 20%
|
Inline with government set reduction targets (07/08) 20%
|
To be negotiated with GOEM in year 2
|
No
|
Heather Munro All LAA Partners
|
All Blocks
|
|
|
6.2 The percentage of people who feel anti-social behaviour to be a very or fairly big problem is lower than the baseline year. (02/03). (Baseline year 20.7%)
|
In line with government set target of (07/08): 19%
|
In line with government set target of (07/08): 19%
|
To be negotiated with GOEM in year 2
|
No
|
Heather Munro All LAA Partners
|
|
|
|
6.3 The percentage of people who think that the police in their area are doing a good or excellent job is higher than in the base line year (02/03) (Baseline year 47.3%)
|
In line with government set target (07/08): 48.4%
|
In line with government set target (07/08): 48.4%
|
To be negotiated with GOEM in year 2
|
No
|
Heather Munro All LAA Partners
|
|
|
|
6.4 The percentage of people who are very or fairly confident about the effectiveness of the CJS in bringing people who commit crimes to justice (Baseline year 02 / 03 38.6%)
|
54% (provisional target, subject to further negotiation by LCJB)
|
Negotiated year on year
|
Negotiated year on year
|
No
|
Heather Munro LCJB Partnership
|
|
|
|
6.5 The fear of crime and ASB within priority neighbourhoods. (Baseline data to be compiled by 31st March 2007)
|
To baseline the levels of ASB within the Priority Neighbourhoods and create a plan for its reduction during subsequent years.
|
To reduce ASB within the priority neighbourhood by the target set for this year in Yr 1
|
To reduce ASB within the priority neighbourhood by the target set for this year in Yr 1
|
No
|
Keith Aubrey All LAA Partners
|
|
|
7. To reduce vulnerability and assist people to feel safe within priority Neighbourhoods
|
7.1 Vulnerability factors specific to each priority neighbourhood drawn from all of the above indicators in Outcomes 1-6
|
During April – Sept the particular vulnerabilities that have made the neighbourhood a priority will be selected from the indicators above. Targets specific to each neighbourhood will be set with the intention of stretching the county wide targets if appropriate. During Sept – April reduce vulnerability by these targets.
|
Reduce vulnerability within the neighbourhoods by the targets set in year 1.
|
Reduce vulnerability within the neighbourhoods by the targets set in year 1.
|
No
|
Keith Aubrey All LAA Partners
|
This outcome cross cuts many aspects of the LAA
|
e-mail page to a friend