Section 1
Best Value And The Comprehensive Performance
Assessment
1.1 Best Value
Best
Value is based on two complementary elements. The first is that continuous improvement in all services
can be achieved by a process of performance management that includes detailed service planning, setting
and monitoring targets for improvement, and developing the abilities of employees to deliver better
services. The second is that major specific issues in service delivery can be addressed by carrying
out fundamental reviews in order to identify the most suitable way of providing the service.
Following
the practical experiences of the first two years of Best Value the Government introduced some changes
to the Best Value process. These included changing the required publication date of this Performance
Plan to 30th June each year, and dropping the requirement to include a five year programme of reviews
covering all services. These changes have recently been reinforced by the introduction of the process
of Comprehensive Performance Assessment to all "upper tier" authorities during 2002. This
involves an external assessment by the Audit Commission of the performance of the Council across all
its major services, and an assessment of its corporate capacity to improve, resulting in an overall
score and the identification of the Council’s strengths and weaknesses. The outcome of the first Assessment
of the County Council is described below.
1.2 Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA)
During 2002 the Audit Commission, on behalf
of the Government, carried out an assessment of the performance of all 150 "upper tier" councils
in the country. This involved bringing together relevant evidence on the performance of individual services,
and also forming a judgement, based on a mixture of self-assessment and inspection, of the corporate
performance of councils. The results were placed in a scoring matrix to produce a single word judgement
on each council in one of five categories: Poor, Weak, Fair, Good, Excellent. The County Council was
judged to be in the Good category overall, and was very close to achieving an Excellent rating. Our
performance on service based assessments was consistently high as reflected in the Audit Commission
Scorecard reproduced below.
How is Leicestershire County Council performing?
Overall performance good
Leicestershire
County Council has been measured as good in the way that it serves its local
people.
We reached this overall rating by looking at:
- how Leicestershire County Council is run;and
- how Leicestershire County Council’s main services perform.
Performance against other Councils

1.
How is Leicestershire County Council run?
Leicestershire County
Council received a measurement of 2 out of 4 for the way it is run.
The
Council delivers strong services, especially in education and social care, and these are supported by
a sound financial framework. More needs to be done to understand the priorities of local people and
partners, to set and deliver a clear and ambitious vision for the county. The Council is well led and
managed but needs to embrace its community leadership role if it is to deliver against its priorities.
2.
How do Leicestershire County Council’s main services perform?
We have assessed
core service performance in the service areas shown below. Each service is scored on a scale from 1
to 4, with 1 being the lowest and 4 being the highest. Education and social care are given more importance
in reaching the overall service score than other areas.
Service
performance 1 (lowest) 4 (highest)
Education 3 out of 4
Social
care – children 3 out of 4
Social care – adults 3 out of 4
Environment
4 out of 4
Libraries and leisure 3 out of 4
Use
of resources 3 out of 4
Overall service performance 4 out of
4
1.3 CPA Recommendations
The
Council’s major services scored highly in the CPA as can be seen above. Improvements to services are
still being made however, as a result of our decisions on priorities and in response to Inspection reports.
The CPA recommendations related mainly to making improvements in some of the corporate elements that
support improving service delivery. The recommended areas for improvement relate to:
- developing clarity in the Council’s community leadership role;
- ensuring the effectiveness and focus of future plans;
- increasing the level of accountability to the public for performance standards;
- increasing the pace of organisational development.
These
issues are addressed as part of the priorities set out in this Performance Plan.
1.4 Audit and Inspection programme
The Audit Commission has agreed an Audit
and Inspection Programme with the Council which is aimed at monitoring our progress, particularly in
the areas identified above, and also carrying out further Inspections of services that have so far not
been subject to Inspection. Full details of the programme are available on the Council’s website.
Page Last Updated: 30 June 2003






