Skip to content Accessibility What's New Complain or Comment Website Feedback Form
Lcc weebsite fox logo for printing

Appendix 2

Our Financial Performance and Budget

The Government has reviewed the basis of allocating funding for local government. The County Council had hoped that this would produce a fairer share of Government funding. Disappointingly the Government’s new system has not redressed the fundamental problems of the previous system and indeed has increased some of them. For example, Leicestershire now has the lowest level of Education funding per pupil of all 150 Education Authorities in England.

2.1 How our resources have been managed in 2002/03

The following table sets out the latest estimate of what we will spend in 2002/03 compared with our original plans. The table indicates that we expect an underspend of £735,000 (or 0.16%), at the year end, although this does not include requests for carry forward of £325,000 which, if agreed, would reduce the projected underspend to £410,000. During the year we have had to deal with significant increases in costs in several services that could have resulted in a significant overspending on the total budget. This has been avoided by close monitoring of the budget and by taking action to control potential budget overspends and to offset unavoidable overspends by making savings elsewhere.
The most significant changes to the budgets during the year were:
  • Education – The overall overspend of £249,000 is mainly due to additional spending on in-county special education needs of £1,610,000 offset by savings of £310,000 as fewer children were placed in schools outside the County. There is also a significant overspend of £210,000 on drug awareness, mainly relating to additional expenditure not matched by external funding. Underspends include £320,000 on mainstream school transport and £460,000 on service units. Provisions and balances of £340,000 have also been utilised to reduce the net overspend. In addition, some growth has been delayed, mainly common admissions policy and early years provision.
  • Social Services – Underspendings have been identified regarding Residential Care (£290,000), lower than expected growth in demand for Home Care (£60,000), continuing difficulties in recruiting specialist staff (£330,000) and lower running costs (£60,000). These underspends are partly offset by additional costs of £540,000, mainly resulting from Home Care retendering.
  • Highways and Transport – Savings include £570,000 on concessionary travel and £220,000 on highways design and maintenance. Increased income of £100,000 is anticipated from statutory undertakings. These underspends are partly offset by an overspend of £120,000 on public transport contracts.
  • Waste Disposal – The underspend of £520,000 includes savings of £120,000 on the disposal costs of fridges and freezers, following allocation of grant from the Government, and £350,000 on disposal costs due to lower than expected tonnage. Additional income of £150,000 from trade waste is anticipated and an underspend of £70,000 on recycling initiatives is forecast due to slippage in agreeing a waste strategy. These underspends are partly offset by an overspends of £140,000 on recycling and household waste sites due to increased haulage costs and £30,000 on sites repair and maintenance etc.
  • Community Services – Underspends on Museums ,Arts and Records (£50,000) and Regulatory Services (£90,000), mainly due to additional income, are offset by an overspend of £20,000 on Sustainable Development.
  • Chief Executives – The assumed level of savings arising through withdrawal from the contract with the Learning and Skills Council for Youth Training will not now be achieved until 2003/04. In addition one off transitional costs were incurred resulting in an overspend of £284,000.
  • Central Items – Capital financing costs are £300,000 higher, mainly due to higher than anticipated transportation capital spending in 2001/02 and the commutation of Magistrates Courts debt. Provisional information indicates that the costs of Job Evaluation and departmental reorganisation will be about £200,000 higher than originally estimated. The contribution to the Combined Fire Authority is expected to increase by £155,000, principally as a result of higher than anticipated retirements. These are partly offset by an increase of £150,000 in income from bank and other interest, as cash balances are higher than anticipated.

Latest Estimate 2002/03 (compared with updated budget)

SPENDING
2002/03 Updated Budget *
£000
2002/03
Latest
Estimate
£000
Difference
£000
Schools
188,123
188,123
0
Education Other
61,317
61,566
249
Social Services
79,479
79,269
-210
Highways & Transport
27,933
27,163
-770
Waste Disposal
12,669
12,149
-520
Community Services
15,872
15,756
-116
Chief Executives
8,267
8,501
234
Resources
13,970
13,954
-16
Total Services
407,630
406,481
-1,149
           
CENTRAL ITEMS         
Bank & Other Interest -2,400 -2,550 -150
Combined Fire Authority 16,629 16,784 155
Financing of Capital 19,350 19,650 300
Flood Defence Levies 2,477 2,474 -3
Magistrates’ Courts 648 612 -36
Pension Costs 1,813 1,776 -37
NDR Revaluation Savings 0 -15 -15
Job Evaluation / Reorganisation 1,500 1,700 200
Total Central Items 40,017 40,431 414
Total Spending 447,647 446,912 -735
Withdrawal from Balances -3,076 -2,341 735
Budget Requirement 444,571 444,571 0
          
FUNDING         
Revenue Support Grant from Government -119,944 -119,944  
National Non-Domestic Rate Income from Government -162,341 -162,341  
Net Surplus on District Council Collection Funds for 2001/02 -840 -840  
Council Tax -161,446 -161,446  
Total Funding -444,571 -444,571  
*This is the original budget for 2002/03 updated for inflation and the carry forward of underspendings from 2001/02.

2.2 Revised Estimate 2002/03 (compared with updated budget)

  
2002/03 Updated Budget *
£000
2002/03
Revised
Estimate
£000
Difference
£000
SPENDING
 
 
 
Schools
188,122
188,122
0
Education Other
61,317
61,707
390
Social Services
79,479
79,270
-209
Highways & Transport
27,933
27,456
-477
Waste Disposal
12,669
12,505
-164
Community Services
15,633
15,651
18
Chief Executives
8,149
8,433
284
Resources
14,328
14,312
-16
Total Services
407,630
407,456
-174
 
 
 
 
CENTRAL ITEMS
 
  
 
Bank & Other Interest
-2,400
-2,500
-100
Combined Fire Authority
16,629
16,784
155
Financing of Capital
19,350
19,650
300
Flood Defence Levies
2,477
2,474
-3
Magistrates’ Courts
648
612
-36
Pension Costs
1,813
1,780
-33
NDR Revaluation Savings
0
-15
-15
Job Evaluation / Reorganisation 1,500 1,500 0
Total Central Items 40,017 40,285 268
Total Spending 447,647 447,741 94
Withdrawal from Balances -3,076 -3,170 -94
Budget Requirement 444,571 444,571 0
           
FUNDING         
Revenue Support Grant from Government -119,944 -119,944  
National Non-Domestic Rate Income from Government -162,341 -162,341  
Net Surplus on District Council Collection Funds for 2001/02 -840 -840  
Council Tax -161,446 -161,446  
Total Funding -444,571 -444,571  
*This is the original budget for 2002/03 updated for inflation and the carry forward of underspendings from 2001/02.

2.3 The budget for 2003/04 and how it has been constructed

The Council receives 64% of its funding directly from central Government. We are therefore very reliant on the levels at which that funding is set when we are considering the amount of Council Tax needed to make up the rest of the budget required to meet the demands for good quality public services.
Although Leicestershire’s grant increased by 6.6% (on a like for like basis), this was insufficient to match the 7.7% increase in net expenditure. Consequently the shortfall has to be met from Council Tax, which has had to be increased by 9.3%. The average County Council increase is 13% across England and 9.6% for our neighbouring Counties.
In arriving at the budget for 2003/04 we have:

Considered what additional funds we can afford to put to those areas we have identified as part of our Medium Term Corporate Strategy;

Closely examined the current spending pressures on services to identify areas where additional funds are required to meet those pressures;

Identified where savings can be made in order to release funds to be used in areas of greater priority or pressure.

The table below sets out the budget for 2003/04 and indicates where the amounts of growth and savings have been allowed for.

2.4 Our Spending Plans for 2003/04

  Proposed Budget
£000
Includes Growth
£000
Includes Savings
£000
SERVICES      
Education Other – Schools Block 32,474 2,419 -94
Education Other – LEA Block 33,084 969 -150
Social Services 91,211 4,075 -1,275
Highways & Transport 28,339 1,000 -1,150
Waste Disposal 13,754 1,020  
Community Services 16,963 816 -292
Chief Executives 9,211 1,105 -255
Resources 13,931 501 -1,150
Total Services (excluding Schools) 238,967 11,905 -4,366
Schools Delegated 215,434    
Total Services 454,401    
           
CENTRAL ITEMS   
  
 
Bank & Other Interest -2,200    
Combined Fire Authority 17,905    
Financing of Capital 20,850    
Flood Defence Levies 2,591    
Magistrates’ Courts 659
 
 
Pension Costs 1,800    
Job Evaluation (excluding Schools) 3,600    
PSA Pump Priming Grant -915    
Total Central Items 44,290    
Total Spending 498,691    
       
FUNDING      
Revenue Support Grant from Government -154,610    
National Non-Domestic Rate Income from Government -163,571    
Net Surplus on District Council Collection Funds for 2002/03 -1,187    
Council Tax -178,493    
Withdrawal from Balances -830    
Total Funding 498,691    
The key features of the budget are:-
  • The Government has issued a "target" budget for Schools-related expenditure. The County Council budget complies with that requirement. Our own calculations indicate that the Government’s figure is not sufficient to fund the cost pressures facing schools. To partly offset this problem, £1m has been transferred to Schools (for 2003-04 only) from the Central Maintenance budget; the equivalent amount of repairs can be met from increased resources in the Council’s capital programme;
  • A number of Education and Social Services specific government grants have been transferred to revenue support grant (RSG). In addition, contributions to the teachers pension fund have increased by over 60%, with most of the extra cost being met by an increase in RSG;
  • Social Services spending continues to grow rapidly as demand for services increase and cost pressures continue;
  • Waste Disposal costs also continue to increase steeply, with a further landfill tax increase and an anticipated increase in waste tonnage;
  • Provision of £3.6m has been made to meet the estimated phased implementation costs of the job evaluation exercise;
  • Budgets have been prepared on an outturn basis, with inflation assumptions of 3.5% for pay, 2% for running costs and 3% for income;
  • The budget includes £4.6m for efficiency and other savings, additional income and transferring expenditure to capital. This reduces the net budget and therefore the required increase in Council Tax.

2.5 Medium Term Corporate Strategy and Other Improvements

Due to continuing pressures on our budgets there are limited resources available to develop the priority areas identified in our Medium Term Strategy. However additional funds have been allocated to the following service developments:
  • Best Value Review of Learning Disabilities;
  • Implementing the results of reviews of public transport and highways network management;
  • Implementation of a waste management strategy;
  • Implementing the "Better Access to Better Services" initiative;
  • Making progress on e-government.
These developments are referred to in more detail in other Sections of this Plan.
In addition to the Medium Term Strategy, other significant improvements include:
  • Extending provision of nursery education for all 3 year olds, at a cost of £2.1m, to meet Government requirements;
  • Re-instating pre 9.30am concessionary travel for older people (dependent on 50% contributions from District Councils);
  • Crime reduction initiatives including improvements to facilities for young people.

2.6 Medium Term Financial Planning

The Medium Term Corporate Strategy makes it clear that the availability of resources will dictate the speed and extent to which priorities are achieved. In this respect we are very dependent on the two thirds of funding we receive from the Government. Following the review of Government funding there will now be a period of stability as there are expected to be only limited changes to the new funding system over the next few years. This should aid the forecasting of future Government funding. We therefore intend to produce a Medium Term Financial Plan, which will set out the priority areas where available resources will be spent over the next three years.

2.7 Public Service Agreement – Cost Effectiveness

As part of the PSA we have agreed targets to improve our performance against a basket of indicators across a range of our services. Making these improvements in performance over the three years of the PSA will improve the cost effectiveness of our services. Details are shown in Appendix 6.

2.8 Our plans to improve our buildings and other assets in 2003/04

As well as the amount we spend on day to day services which are described in the revenue budget above, we also invest in the longer term future of our capital assets. This is done through, for example, the construction or refurbishment of schools or through new or improved road schemes. The Council owns a significant amount of property and other capital assets, and in order to have a logical approach to its maintenance and development, we have produced an Asset Management Plan which identifies all our assets and evaluates the maintenance and development priorities.
In 2003/04 we will spend £54.78m on capital projects. This includes payments of £9.54m relating to schemes that began in earlier years and £45.24m on new projects starting in 2003/04. These total amounts include amounts allocated to us by the Government specifically for the New Deal for schools programme, the schools access initiative, devolved capital to schools, seed challenge and other small specific programmes for Education.
The major new projects that are planned to start in 2003/04 are:
  Cost in 2003/04 £000 Total Cost £000
EDUCATION    
Braunstone Kingsway, Millfield and Ravenhurst Primary Schools - additional classrooms 700 2,068
Syston Wreake Valley Community College – additional classrooms 251 251
Ravenstone Woodstone New Primary School 898 1,590
Ashby Ivanhoe High – additional classrooms and replacement of temporary classrooms 834 951
Melton King Edward VII - additional classrooms 363 385
Oadby Manor High - replacement of temporary classrooms 247 879
Great Dalby Primary - replacement of temporary accommodation 275 275
Kirby Muxloe Primary - replacement of temporary accommodation 276 442
Leicester Forest East, Stafford Leys Primary – replacement of temporary accommodation 332 752
Countesthorpe Greenfield Primary Phase 2 – replacement of temporary accommodation 300 300
Key Stage 4 – Craft, Design & Technology 500 500
     
HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORTATION & WASTE MANAGEMENT    
Rearsby Bypass * 500 6,788
Carriageway maintenance schemes 6,092 6,092
Footway maintenance schemes 1,452 1,452
Bridge strengthening and maintenance 1,285 1,285
Replacement of defective street lighting columns
550
550
Various Schemes to meet targets laid down in 5 year LTP 5,900 5,900
Loughborough civic amenity site improvements 662 662
*(the sums shown represent a provisional allocation pending full acceptance of the scheme following the completion of statutory procedures and review of the cost of the scheme.)    
     
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE    
Various minor building works and other improvements to Social Services establishments 378 378
     
COMMUNITY SERVICES    
Broughton Astley - replacement library 300 605
Measham – replacement library 260 260
Bosworth Battlefield – redevelopment (net of external contributions) 104 376
     
OTHER    
Access for Disabled People – physical adaptation of buildings to meet DDA compliance 300 300
Gilmorton – conversion of farm buildings in Gilmorton to offices 200 200
Development of electronic government & ICT infrastructure 650 650
Protection of Local Services Initiative 150 150
Crime Reduction Initiative - including improvements to facilities for young people 100 100
Better Access to Better Services Initiative 500 500
Significant expenditure will also be incurred in 2003/04 on the following schemes which began in 2002/03 or earlier years.
  Cost in 2003/04
£000
Total Cost
£000
EDUCATION    
Loughborough Limehurst High – replacement annexe 508 1,183
Markfield South Charnwood – replacement design horsa 372 524
Loughborough Burleigh College – replacement temporary classrooms 126 940
Ashby Grammar - consolidation of science accommodation & replacement of temporary classrooms 481 1,248
Countesthorpe Greenfield Primary Phase 1 – replacement of temporary classrooms 988 1,169
Desford the Bosworth Community College – new science laboratories 679 823
Birstall Riverside Primary – replacement of temporary accommodation 454 1,042
Melton Special School - replacement school 1,782 3,256
     
SOCIAL SERVICES    
Welland House - replacement community home 350 700
     
COMMUNITY SERVICES    
Wigston Records Office - remedial works 200 200
     
OTHER    
ICT - Access to Services 140 175

Page Last Updated: 30 June 2003