|
Design Guidance - Part 3
 feedback on this page
|
Part 3 Design guidance
3.1 The guidance contained in this part is intended to help you design development layouts that provide for the safe and free movement of all road users, including cars, lorries, pedestrians, cyclists and public transport. You should select and assemble appropriate design elements to:
We believe that such an approach, coupled with the flexibility that our guidance allows, already reflects many key themes of the Manual for Streets (MfS). Also, we have revised certain aspects of Htd to reflect specific MfS guidance, particularly with regard to visibility splays. We recognise, however, that further work is required to bring Htd even more closely in to line with the MfS, in particular with regard to our road design descriptions and guidance. Meanwhile, this will not stop us seeking residential development layouts that recognise that roads have a wider role to play in creating a sense of place and community as opposed to simply having a functional transport role.
3.2 Where this cannot be achieved by development layouts that are explicitly covered by this guidance, we are prepared to be flexible. Subject to Part 1 paragraph 1.16 onwards we will consider layouts that are not covered by the guidance.
3.3 We will resist developments (for example by recommending refusal of planning permission) where they do not meet the policies and objectives set out in this document. Also, planning authorities are unlikely to favour developments that lack quality layout and design.
(Note: For Leicestershire, please see our 'Highways Status Search' page for details of which exiting roads are adopted. For Nottinghamshire please see 'Adopted road search page' Please contact the relevant highway authority for other areas see Appendix A for details
up to top | back to contents page
3.4 This section sets out our design guidance for adoptable roads. You can find guidance on Home Zones, public transport, providing for pedestrians and cyclists, and providing for horse riders in sections DG3, DG6, DG7 and DG8, respectively.
(Note: Please see our 'Highways Status Search' page for details of which existing roads are adopted)
3.5 We will continue to encourage developers to create layouts that are to an adoptable standard and that will be offered for adoption. We will not normally adopt developments of five or less dwellings.
3.6 For employment and commercial developments, we will normally expect road layouts serving developments of more than one building and with more than one occupier to meet our adoptable design guidance and be offered for adoption. However, you are encouraged to contact the relevant highway with to discuss their adoption requirements for specific proposals. (See Section DG19 for employment and commercial developments served by private drives and areas.)
3.7 You can find advice on how to get your roads adopted under Section 38 of the Highways Act in Part 5 of this document.
up to top | back to contents page
Note:Please see appendix D for additional information on safety audits.
3.8 External roads and other off-site highway works: These are roads that provide a new link in the road network and serve a more general purpose than simply giving access to a development. Unless they fall within the definition of a road (street) as set out in appendix L, you should normally design these in line with the appropriate parts of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and our Specification and standard drawings. They should contain measures to control vehicle speeds and to limit the impact on the environment. We will require safety audits in all cases. We may be prepared to consider permitting direct frontage access from properties to such roads providing that they are subject to a 30mph speed limit and carry no more than 10000 vehicles per day.
3.9 Site access to external roads: Unless the external road falls within the definition of a road (street) as set out in appendix L, you should normally design these in line with the appropriate parts of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and our Specification and standard drawings. We will not normally accept mini-roundabouts unless they form part of a more comprehensive traffic-calming scheme that is either required to minimise the development’s impacts or that has previously been identified. A mini-roundabout will not be acceptable where it is proposed simply because the necessary visibility for a priority junction cannot be achieved. We may be prepared to consider permitting direct frontage access from properties to the external road providing that they are subject to a 30mph speed limit and carry no more than 10000 vehicles per day.
3.10 Site-specific requirements will depend on a number of factors including:
You should establish and agree our requirements with us in the early stages of preparing your development proposals. We will require safety audits in all cases.
3.11 Internal development roads: These are roads that serve only the development. You should normally design them in line with the sections below, which cover residential developments up to 400 dwellings and employment and commercial developments, and our Specification and standard drawings. We will consider the design of development roads for sites of over 400 dwellings, or which are otherwise not covered by the following guidance, on a site-by-site basis.
3.12 We will not normally require safety audits of internal development roads unless:
Figure DG1 Examples of shared surfaces
up to top | back to contents page
3.13 Table DG1 gives general geometry for internal residential roads. In general terms, a residential access road is a conventional cross-section road with separate provision for vehicles and pedestrians. On a residential access way users share a common surface.
(a) We will consider developments in excess of the single-access limits on a site-by-site basis. See also paragraph 3.15.
(b) Care must be taken in the design of roads serving schools. Parking in the vicinity of schools, as children are dropped-off or collected, is a serious safety hazard and can cause traffic congestion.
For new residential developments, any need for a new school on the site must be established early on (see Part 2 para 2.10 onward). The school should be located to maximise opportunities:
All of this will need to be considered as part of the transport assessment for the development and a school travel plan will be required.
Where a proposed development requires the expansion of an existing school, that is the construction of one or more new classrooms, the traffic impacts of the expansion must be considered early on and as part of any transport assessment required for the development. Measures will normally be required to provide ‘safe routes to school’ and minimise the risk of causing or making worse on-street parking problems.
(c) The Manual for Streets suggests that shared surfaces work well in short lengths or where they form cul-de-sacs, where traffic is less than 100 vehicles per hour, and where parking is controlled. Care must be taken in the design of shared-surface layouts to ensure that the development’s whole design, including building type and layout, use of street furniture and so on, conveys to users the nature of the area. Motor vehicles should not dominate and the layout should not simply appear to be a road without footways.
It is also important that any shared surface is designed for blind or partially sighted people and that they include an alternative means for visually impaired people to navigate by. As the Manual for Streets emphasises, we will expect you to consult with relevant representative groups and access officers in designing your proposals.
The type of surfacing materials will normally be a secondary feature in defining the nature of the area. It will not normally be acceptable simply to use a different material to convey the nature of an area to users. We will consider the surfacing material you propose for any shared-surface area with regard to the development’s overall design, including proposed housing layouts.
(d) The carriageway width does not include any footways, verges and so on. We may be prepared to accept a narrower, single carriageway width of 3.7m between kerbs over short lengths as a speed-control feature. The minimum lane width of 3.2m applies only where there are limited restrictions, for example where a pedestrian refuge is provided in the middle of the road.
(e) The corridor width is the minimum space required to accommodate all likely road users and utility equipment (for example, gas, water, cable TV). It does not include any additional space for outward-opening windows, drainage downpipes and so on where dwellings front direct onto the highway. You should define vehicle paths within the corridor by a tracking assessment. See paragraph 3.18.
(f) Where a proposed building fronts directly on to the highway, that is, it has no front garden, it should be set back at least 0.5m behind the proposed highway boundary to allow for opening of windows, drainage downpipes, overhanging eaves and so on .
(g) See paragraph 3.18.
(h) Taking into account the needs of people with impaired mobility, we may be prepared to consider a relaxation to 1:12 on sites with particularly difficult topography.
up to top | back to contents page
3.14 Table DG2 gives the general geometry for internal employment and commercial roads. In general terms, both major industrial access roads and the minor industrial roads are conventional cross-section roads with separated provision for vehicles and pedestrians, but their designs vary depending on likely levels of heavy-goods vehicles (HGVs).
Table DG2: General geometry of employment and commercial roads (a)
(a) Other use classes, for example shopping and leisure, will be considered on a site-by-site basis and depending on the likely numbers of HGVs.
(b) We will recommend planning conditions to restrict change of use from B1 to B2 - B8 developments unless the roads provided are to major industrial road standard – including construction specification – or the development layout provides for their future improvement at a developer’s expense.
(c) Where a B1 development is large enough to generate significant numbers of HGVs, we may require a major industrial road. However, where a B2 - B8 development is small enough to generate only a small number of HGVs, for example business starter units, we may be prepared to accept a minor industrial access road instead.
(d) We will consider developments in excess of the single access limits on a site-by-site basis. See also paragraph 3.15.
(e) See paragraph 3.18.
(f) Taking into account the needs of people with impaired mobility, we may be prepared to consider a relaxation to 1:12 on sites with particularly difficult topography.
up to top | back to contents page
3.15 We will not normally accept emergency accesses because of:
3.16 Usually where developments need two access points to the highway network they should both be to adoptable standards and available for general public use. However, where there are valid reasons why this cannot be achieved, and where the development proposal is otherwise acceptable to us, we may be prepared to consider an emergency access as long as:
3.17 Where suitable access arrangements cannot be achieved, we may refuse to adopt the development roads.
3.18 Tracking is providing the required width for vehicle movement within the overall width of the road. It can also be used to establish appropriate bend radii. Instead of taking the highway engineering requirements as the starting point for layout design, you can consider the arrangement of the buildings and the boundaries of the development first. You can lay out buildings to suit a particular form, with kerblines helping to define and emphasise spaces. The width between kerbs can vary. (You can find further information on how to use tracking in ‘Manual for Streets’, published by the Department for Transport (an example).
3.19 You will then need to check the layout, including widths and bend radii, to make sure that the various types of vehicles you expect to visit and use the road layout can manoeuvre. This is normally likely to include a refuse lorry, fire tender and pantechnicon (for example, a removal lorry) and a bus if the development will be served by public transport. You should do this using a computer software package to generate swept paths for particular types of vehicles and to superimpose them onto layout drawings.
3.20 The tracking assessments will need to take account of any planned or likely on-street parking (see Section DG14, in particular paragraph 3.185 onwards).
3.21 You should check the proposed layout and get our agreement before submitting a planning application. The layout will also need to satisfy other relevant design guidance for the road type to achieve the design speed and to create a safe environment for all road users, including pedestrians and cyclists.
up to top | back to contents page
3.22 Where changes in gradient occur, vertical curves will be required at sags and crests. Except where indicated in the notes to Table DG3, curve lengths should normally be either:
whichever is higher.
Example calculation of length of vertical curve
 For 20mph design speed k = 3 (from Table DG3)
(minimum length for appearance = 20m (from table DG3))
(a) You should hold early discussions with us for large, flat sites to ensure that the vertical alignment is acceptable. In some cases, it may be necessary to provide combined kerb and drainage units to ensure both an acceptable alignment and drainage of the highway.
(b) For crests, it may be necessary to increase the length of vertical curve derived in order to achieve the visibility distance as set out in table DG4.
(c) We may accept shorter curve lengths where there are exceptional difficulties in achieving the length normally required
(d) To avoid stretches of road where water gathers, do not apply the minimum length where A is less than five on any sag curve that results in a low point on the road.
up to top | back to contents page
3.23 Table DG4 sets out visibility splays required for junctions, bends and at vertical crests. For proposed internal development roads, you should normally base visibility splay on an assessment of likely 85th% ile vehicle speeds. For existing roads, you should base it on measured vehicle speeds. We will normally require you to carry out radar surveys to measure existing speeds and establish the 85th% ile.
3.24 While taking into account the design speeds in Tables DG1 and DG2, we will assess visibility requirements based on likely vehicle speeds within a proposed development. Where we are satisfied that speeds are, in practice, likely to be lower than the design speeds, we will normally be prepared to consider correspondingly shorter splays. The reverse is also true - if speeds are likely to be higher, the splays will need to be correspondingly greater in length.
(b) Where speed is assessed to be over 20mph, splay provision will normally be based on the appropriate ‘measured 85th %ile vehicle speed’ distance.
(c) Based on Manual for Streets, ‘adjusted for bonnet length’ distances.
(d) Based on Design Manual for Roads and Bridges.
up to top | back to contents page
(For all horizontal visibility splays, where a footway, cycleway or similar is provided, the rear of the footway and so on should coincide with (match) the rear edge of the visibility splay.)
Figure DG2a Junctions
* Set back will depend on scale and nature of proposed development
Figure DG2b Bends Note: For all road types within a development, visibility (at junctions, bends or crests) in the vertical plane should normally be measured from a drivers eye-height of no less than 1.05m above the road surface to a point no less than 0.6m above the road surface. This is as set out in Manual for Streets. On roads outside of the development, for example at the site access, the visibility should normally be measured from an eye-height of not less than 1.05m to a point not less than 0.26m, in line with the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges. However, if they fall within the definition of a road (street) as defined at appendix L, visibility can normally be measured as if the road lies within a development
Figure DG2c Crests in road (brow of hill)  up to top | back to contents page
3.25 Basic junction forms should be determined at the concept layout (masterplanning) stage with the more detailed proposals developed as the development proposal evolves. Table DG5 and the accompanying illustrations highlight broad junction types and the corner radii that should normally be provided within developments.
The above diagram is based upon Figure 7.9 of the Manual for Streets. The Manual for Streets is copyright of the Department for Transport and Department of Communities and Local Government.
(a) See paragraph 3.9 for site access junctions.
(b) See Section DG9 for details on lining and signing.
(d) For further details, please paragraph 3.11 onwards.
(e) Radii based on road widths set out in Table DG1 and Table DG2, assuming that roads meet at an angle of 90 degrees. For other circumstances (including any proposals for tighter radii), you will be required to provide computer tracking assessments (see paragraph 3.18) of your proposed layout.
(f) Other factors will also be taken into account in considering your junction proposals. This includes the likelihood of on-street parking problems in the vicinity of the junction and whether or not the roads are likely to form part of a bus route.
(g) Where a corner radius is less than 7.5m, footway strengthening will be needed. Please see Part 4 paragraph 4.97.
up to top | back to contents page
3.26 You should normally avoid priority-controlled (‘Give way’) crossroads. When a crossroads cannot be avoided, you should normally provide an appropriate form of control such as a roundabout. Mini-roundabouts will not normally be acceptable to provide access to a development unless they form part of a more comprehensive traffic-calming scheme that is either required to reduce the development’s impacts or that has previously been identified.)
3.27 You should space road junctions on the same side of a road so that a vehicle waiting to enter the main road at one does not interfere with visibility for a vehicle waiting at another.
Figure DG3 Junction spacing
3.28 There should normally be no accesses for vehicles:
3.29 Elsewhere, we will normally accept accesses as long as they meet safety considerations and comply with the guidance on the design of private accesses and areas set out in Section DG18 and Section DG19.
up to top | back to contents page
3.30 On residential roads serving more than 25 dwellings, carriageways should normally be widened at bends that curve through more than 10 degrees.
3.31 Bends should normally be widened in industrial and commercial developments.
3.32 For any proposals not conforming to the figures in the above table, you will need to produce computerised vehicle-path assessments to show that the proposed layout can accommodate appropriate vehicles without danger to other road users, including pedestrians and cyclists.
3.33 A turning head should normally be provided at the end of all cul-de-sacs or wherever vehicles would otherwise have to reverse over long distances – normally anything over 25m, in line with BS5906, 1980. You should also provide turning heads where turning vehicles might damage adjacent verges or footways. Figure DG4 shows minimum turning dimensions and areas.
3.34 You should give careful consideration to the design of the development surrounding the turning head to make sure that its use is not reduced by on–street parking. Where on-street parking is likely to cause problems, we will normally expect you to provide measures to control it (see Section DG14, in particular paragraphs 3.189 onwards).
3.35 We will consider larger areas, such as residential squares, which provide the minimum turning dimensions as long as their use as a turning head would not be affected by on-street parking. You would also be required to provide clear details of who is responsible for maintenance. Where it is intended that we adopt any extra areas over the normal minimum, we may require you to pay commuted sums for future maintenance (see Part 4 Section MC18).
up to top | back to contents page
Figure DG4a Example of a turning head within a 'square'
Figure DG4b Turning heads for use on residential access roads and minor industrial access roads serving offices
W = 4.8m up to 50 dwellings
W = 5.5m from 50 - 400 dwellings W = 6m for B1 use class office developments Figure DG4c Turning heads for use on industrial/commercial estate roads
3.36 Please refer to Part 4.
3.37 We will normally adopt a new road where:
3.38 Please see Part 5 for details of adopting roads under a Section 38 agreement of the Highways Act. In this Part, Section DG18 gives guidance on the layout of private roads and areas in residential developments and Section DG19 gives guidance on the layout of industrial and commercial developments.
3.39 In some cases, commuted sums may be payable. For example this will normally be for:
Note:
Where you are proposing SUDS, you must hold discussions with all relevant parties at an early stage (and certainly before any planning application) to agree ownership and responsibility for the facility.
This is not an exhaustive list, and there are other occasions described throughout this document where we require the payment of commuted sums, for example vertical traffic calming.
3.40 Please refer to Part 4 for further details of where commuted sums will normally be payable and for details of how they are calculated.
up to top | back to contents page
3.41 ‘Home Zone’ is the term used for a street where people and vehicles share the whole of the road space safely and equally.
3.42 Home Zones are based on a change in the way that people regard the street. Motorists should feel that they have left the normal highway and have entered an area where they can expect to find people who are using the whole of the street. Simply, Home Zones should make motorists feel they are guests in a pedestrian environment, and they should drive accordingly.
3.43 Home Zones may consist of shared surfaces, indirect traffic routes, areas of planting and features such as seating to encourage people to use the street. Entry gateways and signing will be needed to mark the limits of the area.
3.44 Home Zones are a relatively new idea in the UK, and some of the legal regulations to introduce them have only recently been put in place.
3.45 Section 268 of the Transport Act 2000 provides the legal basis for establishing Home Zones in England and Wales. It permits local traffic authorities (us, in this case) in England and Wales to designate any street or streets as a Home Zone. However, this in itself does not change the legal use of the highway. This can only be done by local authorities making use orders and speed orders for designated Home Zones.
3.46 The Secretary of State has recently made the necessary regulations under the Transport Act setting out the procedures for designating Home Zones and making use orders and speed orders. A use order will allow activities other than moving vehicles (such as children’s play), to take place legally on streets. A speed order will allow the traffic authority to define an appropriate design speed for the Home Zone.
3.47 We will consider proposals for Home Zones on a site by site basis.
up to top | back to contents page
3.48 If you want to progress proposals that include Home Zone concepts, you should discuss your ideas with us and the planning authority at the earliest opportunity and before you submit a planning application. You should also take account of the following general design considerations.
3.49 Location
We will consider Home Zones in principle off any class of road, subject to our access policy in Part 1 of this document. Where accessed off a classified (A, B or other classification) road or off a busy unclassified road, the junction must be formed in line with the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and there must be a length of access road between the site access and the beginning of the Home Zones. The length of the access road will depend on the speed and flow of traffic on the main road, the size of the Home Zone and local topography. Each site will be considered on its merits. Home Zones on other classifications of road may normally be served by a dropped-kerb arrangement.
3.50 The scale of development
Figure DG5 Home Zones arranged to form a larger development
up to top | back to contents page
3.51 Layout
3.52 So we can properly and efficiently consider any development proposals that either are, or include, a Home Zone, you must submit a concept proposal and supporting information in line with Part 2 of this document.
3.53 We will continue to review our guidance on Home Zones in the light of any new national guidance and practical experience gained.
up to top | back to contents page
3.54 We will normally adopt a new Home Zone, subject to the requirements in paragraph 3.37 onwards.
3.55 Wherever possible, in the interests of road safety and to reduce environmental impacts, commercial and employment developments that generate larger goods vehicles should be kept separate from residential areas. You should design layouts so this type of commercial and employment traffic does not need to use residential roads. Similarly, Home Zones cannot be used to access these developments.
3.56 To support sustainable development, we may accept mixed-use developments that include small developments that generate very few goods vehicles, such as offices or a shop, particularly in or close to town centres.
3.57 Where a mixture of residential and commercial traffic is likely to use a road, the design elements, including materials and construction, should be based on the largest vehicles likely to use any particular section of the road.
3.58 We will normally adopt road layouts in mixed developments subject to the requirements in paragraph 3.37 onwards.
up to top | back to contents page
3.59 For developments outside the city, vehicle speeds within new developments should normally be controlled through the design and layout of the roads and the locations of buildings and not normally by using traffic-calming features (particularly vertical features such as road humps). Within Leicester City, all new developments should be designed so that a 20mph zone can be introduced and vertical traffic calming may be used to achieve this. You should avoid:
You should break up stretches of straight road by either junctions or 90-degree bends as shown in Figure DG6.
3.60 Where there are valid reasons why vehicle speeds cannot be controlled through site layout, and traffic calming measures are required, in the county areas you should consider horizontal measures first and you should use vertical measures only as a last resort. There is greater flexibility to use vertical measures in Leicester City. We will normally require commuted sum payments to cover future maintenance (see Part4 Section MC18). Some examples of measures are shown in Figure DG6. Any traffic calming should normally be in accordance with advice contained in Department for Transport Traffic Advisory Leaflets as listed in Part 9.
3.61 Take particular care over choosing any type of traffic-calming measure on a proposed bus route (see Section DG6, in particular paragraphs 3.95 onwards).
3.62 You must take particular care on key routes that are used or are likely to be used by the emergency services. While certain types of traffic calming (particularly vertical measures such as road humps) can have potential road safety benefits, they can also adversely affect the response times of emergency vehicles. Where traffic calming is proposed on a key route, you will need to consult the emergency services at a very early stage (and certainly before you submit any planning application) and you will need to work closely with them in the design of any measures.
Table DG8: Maximum lengths of straight for vehicle speed control (a)
3.63 Where any form of vertical calming feature is proposed, you should not site it within 25m of the edge of a structure, for example, a bridge or culvert. You should also site such features clear of private accesses and driveways to avoid problems of vehicles ‘grounding’ as they turn into or out of the accesses or drives.
3.64 We will be prepared to consider other methods of vehicle speed control in the light of practical experience of their effectiveness and any further research. However, because of problems with noise and vibration, we will not normally accept ‘rumble strips’.
up to top | back to contents page
Figure DG6a Speed control bend (please also see Part 4, paragraph 4.91)
Stagger length and car speeds and Minimum dimensions of stagger length for larger vehicles
Figure DG6c Example of chicane including cycle 'bypass' Note: Length of cycle lane to be agreed
Figure DG6d Junction table (please also see Part 4, paragraph 4.86) Figure DG6e Cross section of speed tables with alterations for steep roads shown in lower diagram (please also see Part 4, paragraph 4.86)
  Figure DG6f Example of vehicle speed control by development layout Note: Please see our standard drawings for junction tables, speed cushions and road humps.
up to top | back to contents page
3.65 Where a development requires speed-control measures on the existing external highway network, for example, to help minimise its impacts or to achieve safe site access, there will have to be an additional public consultation separate from the planning process including advertising of features and where appropriate a different speed limit. These separate consultations are required even where the development has received planning permission. Because of problems with noise and vibration, we will not normally accept ‘rumble strips’.
3.66 These consultations can often be an extensive and lengthy process, particularly where statutory procedures are involved. You will normally be required to fund all costs associated with these consultations.
3.67 We will normally seek to secure the speed-control measures and the funding of any associated costs through an appropriate legal agreement.
3.68 You should get early advice on the likely timescale and procedures involved for your specific proposals. Take this information into account when you draw up the programme for your proposed development and in any negotiations that you may have with the landowner of the development site.
In Leicester City, on residential distributor roads vertical features can only be introduced after discussions with the appropriate Cabinet Lead. Speed cushions are normally preferred for residential distributor roads. However, if road humps are the only solution these should be a maximum of 65mm in height (possibly 75mm subject to agreement) and over 7m in length (only on bus routes). All traffic calming installed on the existing road network as part of a s278 agreement should include a speed reduction feature prior to any vertical feature where the 85th percentile approach speed is greater that 30mph.
3.69 Please refer to Part 4.
3.70 In the interests of sustainability, new development should be located in areas well served by alternative means of transport to the private car, including buses, taxis and cycle routes.
3.71 Particularly if your development requires any form of transport assessment (see Part 2 Table PDP1), you should seek early advice from us and bus operators on:
(A system which provides waiting passengers with details of when the next bus is due and the route number. This is known as ‘real-time information’, and the system currently used in Leicester, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire is ‘star trak’.)
3.72 You should discuss these issues and agree the general approach as soon as possible as the outcomes are likely to have a bearing on:
3.73 Additionally, where a development requires a concept proposal (see Part 2 paragraph 2.17), you should clearly identify and detail any agreed public transport facilities and routes.
up to top | back to contents page
3.74 Where you are proposing public transport as a sustainable alternative to using cars, the service must realistically be capable of delivering a shift away from the car. To achieve any significant shift, it is likely that the service will have to be more frequent than once an hour during the day, Monday to Saturday, with an evening and Sunday service for larger developments.
3.75 We will consider developments on a site-by-site basis. We will assess any estimates for likely levels of public transport use included in any transport assessments or draft travel plans, against existing or proposed bus routes, vehicle capacities and timetables. We will need to be satisfied that a public transport service can be provided that is realistically capable of achieving the proposed level of use by the development’s occupants.
3.76 We will also consider any phasing in of services, particularly for larger developments, on a site-by-site basis. Issues that will need to be discussed and agreed include:
3.77 Through the planning process we will normally recommend to planning authorities that developers fund public transport services through a Section 106 agreement which, among other things, specifies the level of support which must be provided to the service and over what time period. While we will seek to work with you to reach a suitable agreement, we will resist (for example by recommending refusal of any planning application) development proposals that do not meet the policies and objectives set out in this document, (see Part 1, paragraph 1.24 onwards)
3.78 Generally walking distances to bus stops in urban areas should be a maximum of 400m and desirably no more than 250m. In rural areas the walking distance should not be more than 800m.
3.79 You should design pedestrian routes to bus stops to be as direct, convenient and safe as possible to encourage use of public transport You should design the routes in line with principles set out in paragraph 3.108. They should:
You should place bus stops in employment or commercial areas near building entrances and avoid locations where passing traffic speeds are high. In rural areas there should always be at least a footway from any proposed development to the nearest bus stop.
3.80 Where there is a footway on the opposite side of the road, a pedestrian crossing point should normally be provided next to a bus stop, and designed in line with the appropriate standard drawing. The crossing point should be located as close as is possible to the stop, bearing in mind safety considerations.
up to top | back to contents page
3.81 You should think carefully about the proposed layout of the development in the immediate vicinity of a bus stop to:
3.82 You should not site bus stops within 30m of vertical traffic-calming features (including domed mini roundabouts). This is to minimise the risk of passengers waiting to get off the bus being thrown about the inside of the bus, and to allow boarding passengers time to sit down.
3.83 To erect a new bus stop or relocate an existing bus stop on an existing public highway you need to get agreement from:
3.84 The minimum footway width at a bus stop should normally be 3m. Where a shelter is to be provided (see paragraph 3.86), there should be at least 0.5m clearance between any part of the shelter and the edge of the carriageway. There should be a clear footway of at least 1.3m (1.8m in the city) between the shelter and the rear edge of the footway (both for cantilever-style shelters where the roof extends beyond the support and enclosed shelters). Where you cannot achieve this, but there are no alternative locations to site the shelter, then we will consider site-specific shelter designs.
Figure DG7 Bus shelter siting
3.85 Accessible raised kerbing to a height of 180mm will be required at all stops. The length of raised kerbing should normally be 6m in the county and 4m in the city (plus 1m transition kerbs at either end) with a minimum run of 3m (plus transition kerbs). The stop should be located and laid out so a bus can stop parallel to and close to the raised kerbing.
Figure DG8 Raised kerbing at bus stops
up to top | back to contents page
3.86 Shelters will usually only be required at key access points where there are likely to be higher passenger flows, for example, near:
3.87 Where we will not own a bus shelter, you will need a licence from us to erect it. Where shelters will display advertising, you will also need planning permission from the planning authority. We will also need to be satisfied that appropriate arrangements are in place for the shelter’s future maintenance.
Note: in Leicester City new bus shelters may only be introduced through the contract we have with JC Decaux. All installation and maintenance costs will be met by the developer.
3.88 We will consider how bus service information will be provided at bus stops on a site-by-site basis. Depending on the nature and size of the development, the information provided could consist of:
Figure DG9 Examples of bus service information
3.89 Lay-bys will normally only be required at places where a large number of people will want to board a bus such as local shops, schools or other locations where buses may wait for a time and could cause localised congestion or be a safety hazard.
3.90 Where lay-bys are to be provided, they should normally be designed to accommodate 15m long buses as indicated in Figure DG10 below.
Figure DG10 Bus lay by
3.91 When the development is being constructed, you should, where appropriate, make provision for shelter lighting and real-time bus information facilities to be installed at a future date. This should include, for example, installing suitable underground ducting.
3.92 We will normally require a commuted sum payment to cover future maintenance of bus stop facilities that we are to maintain. Please see Part 4 for further details.
up to top | back to contents page
3.93 Where a development is likely to be accessed using public transport, any roads which buses are likely to run along should normally be at least 6m wide (subject to tracking assessment) and should be reasonably straight. A more generous swept path is also likely to be required to take account of where vehicles might park on-street, for example. It will not be acceptable to route bus services along either shared-surface roads (that is, access ways, see Section 3 ) or through Home Zones. We may consider exceptions for services operated by smaller vehicles (for example, minibuses) where there is no practical alternative to serving the development by public transport.
3.94 Buses should be able to enter and exit from the development as easily and directly as possible. Where appropriate, bus-priority measures such as bus lanes and traffic signals should be used to help bus movement. You should discuss and agree provision for specific sites with us and bus operators.
3.95 Any horizontal speed-control features, including 90-degree bends and horizontal traffic calming measures (for example, chicanes) , should normally be designed to accommodate the swept path of a 15m long rigid bus (the largest vehicle size now permissible). You should discuss and agree design details jointly with us and the bus operators. You will need to give us computer assessments of vehicle swept paths to demonstrate that your proposals will work in practice.
3.96 You should not use vertical traffic calming on bus routes unless there is no other speed control solution. If there is no suitable alternative you should:
Note: Please see our standard drawings for junction tables, speed cushions and road humps.
3.97 For certain developments, particularly larger sites, providing bus-only links may be appropriate. You should provide these where:
3.98 You should discuss and agree requirements for specific sites jointly with us and the bus operators. But generally you will need to provide (and pay for) traffic regulation orders (TROs) to restrict the link’s lawful use. You also need to consider the following.
3.99 We will normally need a commuted sum payment to cover the future maintenance of any control systems. Please see Part 4 for further details.
Figure DG11 Example of a bus only link
up to top | back to contents page
3.100 It may be appropriate for particularly large developments which generate high passenger numbers, and which are located at key points on the road network, to provide a public-transport interchange with comprehensive facilities. Examples of developments and locations might include:
3.101 Examples of facilities might include:
3.102 We will consider development proposals and maintenance responsibilities on a site-by-site basis.
up to top | back to contents page
3.103 Walking and cycling offer real alternatives to journeys by car particularly over shorter distances. In the interests of sustainability new developments must make appropriate, high quality provision for pedestrians and cyclists and where it is necessary to break a road link in order to discourage through traffic, it is recommended that links for pedestrians and cyclists are maintained. In respect of cycling, this includes provision of appropriate parking and supporting facilities (for example showers and lockers) as detailed in Section DG16.
3.104 Table DG9 sets out general geometry for pedestrian-only routes, including footways and footpaths. Routes for joint use by pedestrian and cyclists, or by cyclists only, are covered in Table DG10. Surfaces used by pedestrians should be free from hazards that could cause them to trip.
Table DG9: Pedestrian-only routes
(a) Includes things such as bollards, sign posts, guard railing, lamp columns and utility equipment (for example gas, water, cable TV). You should liaise with utility providers to achieve this for equipment installed while the development is being built. The clearance should be increased to 2m where pedestrian flows may be heavy, in the region of 500 an hour. Please see Section DG11 for more guidance on locating utility equipment.
(b) Taking into account the needs of people with impaired mobility, we may be prepared to consider a relaxation to 1:12 on sites with particularly difficult topography.
(c) Crossovers to private drives and parking should be carefully designed so as not to create inconvenient cross-falls for pedestrians.
(d) Includes higher and further education facilities.
Table DG10: Joint use of cycle and pedestrian routes and cycle-only use
(a) Normally provide joint use, except where cyclist and pedestrian flows are likely to be high, for example, outside a school or in a shopping area. Where cyclists and visually-impaired pedestrians could meet, you should provide warning surfaces to standard drawings
(d) Crossovers to private drives and parking areas should be carefully designed so as not to create inconvenient cross-falls for pedestrians.
(e) Where a route is bounded (for example by a wall, fence or bridge parapet) you should normally add an additional 0.25m for each side bounded where the boundary height does not exceed 1.2m, and an additional 0.5m for each side bounded where the boundary height exceeds 1.2m.
up to top | back to contents page
3.105 Please see the relevant authorities cycle best practice documents,(Nottinghamshire's cycle best practice document) or contact them for further layout details for where a cycleway leaves or joins the carriageway and other details.
3.106 Porch roofs, awnings, garage doors, bay windows, balconies or other building elements should not oversail (project over) footways at a height less than 2.6m; the headroom over routes used by cyclists should normally be 2.7m. If any part of a building projects over the adoptable highway, you will need to apply to us for a licence under Section 177/178 of the Highways Act before we adopt your roads. If you do not apply for a licence, we may not adopt your roads. Where a route runs alongside a road, its rear edge should normally coincide with the rear of visibility splays at junctions and on bends so the splay is clear and pedestrians and cyclists do not impede visibility. You should achieve this either by widening the footway or providing a verge. Grassed verges should be at least 1m wide and minimum area of 10sqm, otherwise you should use hard landscaping.
3.107 Routes that run separately from a road are not normally encouraged; for example, the Manual for Streets sets out that cyclists should generally be accommodated on the carriageway in residential areas. But where a separate route can be justified, for example, where it is necessary to break a road link to discourage through traffic or to give a more direct link to shops, schools, community facilities or public transport, you should take care to minimise crime opportunities. We will generally work with the relevant polics force's Architectural Liaison Officer (ALO) to promote personal safety, and you should seek early advice from the FALO on proposals for specific sites. (Please see paragraph 3.119 about adopting routes.)
3.108 As general guidance however, justified separate routes should normally meet the following criteria.
Figure DG12 Examples of a poor pedestrian link (left) and a good pedestrian link (right)
3.109 Where a separate route joins another pedestrian or cycle route which runs alongside a carriageway (vehicle route), you should design its junction with the road network:
Figure DG13 Visibility splays at junctions for cyclists
up to top | back to contents page
3.110 The guidance on road crossings applies both to where pedestrians or cyclists are travelling:
3.111 In either case, appropriate crossing facilities will normally be required. You should agree requirements for specific sites with us in the early stages of preparing your development proposals.
3.112 The normal basic requirement is to provide dropped kerbs with buff-coloured tactile paving as in our standard drawings. Where a refuge in the middle of the road is required, you should provide this to standard drawings with:
3.113 Please see the relevant council’s cycle best practice document for further layout details for cycle crossings. Nottinghamshire's cycle best practice document.
3.114 In very large developments it may be necessary to consider some form of light-controlled crossing such as a Zebra, PELICAN or TOUCAN, to provide safe and attractive routes for pedestrians and cyclists.
3.115 Whatever the crossing type, if you need to provide guard railing to guide pedestrians or cyclists, it should be high-visibility railing as in our standard drawings.
3.116 Where cyclists and visually-impaired pedestrians could potentially meet, you should provide surfacing to guide the visually-impaired users along the correct pedestrian route, in line with Department for Transport’s ’Guidance on the use of Tactile Paving Surfaces’.
Signing for routes3.117 Direction signing can help to highlight and promote the use of a route, although you should take care to minimise clutter and visual disruption. You should identify any requirements for specific sites and agree them with us in the early stages of preparing your development proposal. Any signing and lining you provide should be designed in line with the guidance in Part 4 and our best practice document.
3.118 Please refer to Part 4.
3.119 Where new footways and cycleways are located alongside roads that we are adopting, we will usually adopt them as publicly-maintained footways and cycleways as long as they have been constructed to our satisfaction.
3.120 We may also consider adopting other routes where they serve a strategic purpose, for example, where they form part of a wider network (existing or planned) or provide a more direct link to:
providing that the routes have been constructed and lit to our satisfaction.
3.121 Part 5 provides details on procedures for adopting new routes under Section 38 agreements. Part 6 covers works on the existing public highway under Section 278 agreements.
3.122 We will not normally adopt routes:
3.123 You should discuss adoption issues with us in the early stages of preparing your development proposals.
up to top | back to contents page
3.124 You cannot obstruct or divert an existing right of way without obtaining the Rights of Way Authority’s consent (even if planning permission has been granted). You should accommodate an existing footpath on its existing right of way wherever possible. If, however, the Rights of Way Authority agrees in principle to a diversion, you will need a diversion order. The planning authority usually processes applications to divert rights of way using powers under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
3.125 In all cases, the route of existing rights of way should normally be designed in line with the guidance set out in this document. You should take particular care to design bridleways to prevent their misuse by motor vehicles.
3.126 Where a development requires highway rights to be extinguished (removed), for example, to stop-up a length of road, this also should normally be done by the planning authority under the Town and Country Planning Act. You should get our agreement to your proposals to extinguish highway rights before you submit a planning application.
3.127 The procedures involved in making diversion orders or orders to extinguish existing highway rights can be very lengthy. You should get advice on the likely timescale and take this into account when you programme your proposals. Whether or not any order is successfully made, you will normally be responsible for paying all costs associated with processing it.
3.128 We are working along with organisations such as Sustrans and other highway authorities to provide a safe and convenient cycle network throughout our areas. Where a site stands close to this network, you will normally be expected to provide links to it as part of your proposals. You will also be expected to contribute towards its completion where it is reasonable to ask you to do so.
3.129 Please see Section DG16.
3.130 Horse riders are entitled to use bridleways and all-purpose roads. You should consider them in the design and safety audit of all developments which either:
3.131 The guidance in this section relates generally to lower-speed single carriageway roads. For facilities for horse riders in other circumstances, please refer to TA57/87 Roadside Features, section 11.
3.132 Bridleways carry horse riders, cyclists and pedestrians, and you should take the needs of all these groups into account.
3.133 For horses, a blinded crushed stone surface is often best, being hard wearing without being as hard on hooves as asphalt.
3.134 Where a new junction is formed between a bridleway and a road, there should be sufficient standing space for a horse and adequate visibility for the rider. You should provide a bridleway sign. Please see TA57/87 Fig 11 and Table 2 for further details.
3.135 New roads likely to carry significant horse traffic (more than 100 passages a week) may need verges suitably surfaced for horses. For particularly well-used routes, for example, near a riding school, you should consider providing a separate horse trackway beyond the verge, possibly separated from vehicles by fencing or a hedge.
up to top | back to contents page
3.136 You will normally be required to provide all road markings and traffic signs both on the internal development roads and on the surrounding road network where necessary. Occasionally, this may involve signing at some distance from the development, for example, for routeing HGVs.
3.137 At your developments' site access, lining and signing should be provided in accordance with Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002 (TSRGD). For priority junctions within developments, junction lining and signing:
Other types of development will be considered on a site-by-site basis.
3.138 In addition to markings at junctions as indicated above, carriageway centre-line markings will:
Other types of development will be considered on a site-by-site basis.
3.139 Signing and lining, in accordance with TSRGD, should also be provided at all road humps/tables, at any entry ramps to side roads and at any other traffic calming features. Where parking bays are not clearly defined, markings will be required to segregate them from the carriageway.
3.140 Wherever signing and road markings are required, you should normally provide them in line with the requirements set out in Part 4, Section MC12, including the need for illumination. You should establish at an early stage in the detailed design process which signs will require illumination to make sure that appropriate electrical supplies are installed during construction work.
3.141 Where a development requires changes to an existing traffic regulation order (TRO) or a new order is required, you will normally be required to pay all costs associated with this, including all consultation and legal costs. TROs are subject to statutory procedures and consultations. This can be a very lengthy process and a successful outcome is not guaranteed. You should get advice on the likely timescale and take this into account when you programme your proposals.
3.142 We normally require a suitable system of street lighting on all adoptable roads, which we will normally design for you in areas to be adopted. This is important for both road safety and to help promote personal safety and minimise crime opportunities. It is also important that you plan the lighting at the same time as you design the street layout. Also, to encourage pedestrians to use a route and to feel safe, it is important that lighting levels are maintained at the same standard along a route, whether a route is adopted or not. There are also wider design issues. When you prepare development proposals, you should consider the purpose of the lighting, its scale and the proposed width of the street and height of the building.
3.143 For more details on lighting, please see Part 4.
up to top | back to contents page
Note: Our standard conditions applying to highway works for new development provide more advice on dealing with utility equipment during construction of your works.
3.144 Early in your planning process you should consider the location and installation of utility equipment both above and below ground, particularly where surface areas are shared. Normally, private equipment should not be located in the highway* but utility company’s equipment should be. Where a shared-surface layout is proposed without a separate service margin or where a development layout is not explicitly covered by this guidance, you should hold early discussions with utility providers and supply us with details of proposed locations for utility equipment. This will enable us to consider the layout, for example, in terms of safety and accessibility.
*This can be difficult to achieve with layouts where houses are located very close to the highway boundary. However, if you do not deal with this matter, it may lead to problems in future with us adopting your road.
3.145 Any separate service margin should be at least 2m wide, in line with National Joint Utilities Group (NJUG) 7. And any utility equipment that is above ground, for example, cabinets, boxes, pillars and pedestals should be sited so that it:
3.146 All apparatus above the ground should:
3.147 Where equipment is to be located in a proposed adoptable highway, you should locate cabinets and so on in the verge where possible. You should leave at least 1m between the cabinet and the edge of the carriageway in rural areas and 1.5m in urban areas. Access doors should always open to the footway. If there is no verge, you must position cabinets and so on at the back of footway and keep:
3.148 We may consider adopting any additional small areas so above-ground apparatus can meet locational requirements. If, however, you cannot meet the requirements within adoptable areas, you should locate cabinets and so on off the proposed adoptable highway. You may need an easement to allow utility equipment providers access in future for maintenance purposes.
3.149 You should locate equipment below ground in line with NGU7. You should locate any access chambers that are on the surface to:
Figure DG14 Arrangement of below ground service equipment
3.150 Where developments include central recycling points, you should site these also in line with the above guidance.
up to top | back to contents page
3.151 We have a duty to make sure that developments include satisfactory arrangements for draining the adoptable highway. This should normally be achieved by one of the following methods.
All highway drains should be located within land that we are adopting. Only in exceptional circumstances will we permit them in land that is to remain private. You must cover any adoptable highway drain outside the limits of the adoptable highway by an easement agreement. This should be in place before, or be a condition of, the Section 38 or 278 agreement.
3.152 We will consider alternative highway-drainage systems, including SUDS, flow attenuation (reduction) or retention systems (including oversized pipes) and so on, on a site-by-site basis. Where there are valid reasons for providing systems like these, and where they would present us with extra maintenance liability over a piped system, we will require you to pay commuted sums. Please see Part 4, Section MC18 for further details on our commuted sums policy.
3.153 We will not adopt a road unless its associated drainage is to be adopted either by a water company or by us.
3.154 We will not normally accept drainage of other non-adopted areas into any highway system. In general, the drainage of most other areas of a development are matters for water companies. You should normally design these drainage systems in line with the water companies’ specifications and requirements (which you may treat as complementary to this document) and they should be adopted by them.
3.155 Please refer to Part 4 Section MC8 for more details on highway drainage design and to Part 4 Section MC18 for more details on commuted sums.
3.156 Soft or hard landscaping within highway areas can be as important in determining the character of the development and integrating it into its surroundings as landscaping elsewhere within the site. You should not underestimate how important it is to create an attractive environment. Planning authorities are unlikely to favour developments that lack quality design and layout.
3.157 Areas we are prepared to adopt as highway should be concentrated into larger areas, to provide economies of scale and to avoid small or remote areas which are difficult to maintain. Small and remote areas can actually result in the very opposite of what is intended of creating an attractive and well-cared-for environment.
3.158 You should prepare landscaping proposals at the pre-planning application stage so we can consider their suitability in good time and so the utility providers (for example, gas, water, cable TV) can be consulted over the proposals. We must approve the landscaping proposals within the development whether or not they form part of a landscaping scheme that you have submitted to the planning authority for approval. (Please see Part 4 for further information).
3.159 While planting and trees can enhance the street scene, you must take care when you are selecting and positioning trees, shrubs and so on to make sure that building frontages and parking areas can still enjoy good natural observation from areas of potential activity such as roads and footways.
3.160 We will require the payment of a commuted sum for any proposed planting, trees, shrubs and so on that we are prepared to adopt. Please see Part 4, Section MC18 for further details on our commuted sums policy.
3.161 Public open spaces, including amenity open spaces and children’s play areas, will normally be adopted by the district, town or parish council. We will normally only consider adopting an area of open space that:
You will need to pay us a commuted sum for any open space we adopt.
up to top | back to contents page
3.162 This section sets out off-street parking standards and gives guidance on the design of parking in residential and employment and commercial developments. It covers vehicle parking, provision for service vehicles, motorcycle parking and cycle parking.
3.163 We will be considering parking standards further with District Councils as they prepare their development plans. In particular:
We will review the standards in the light of any further national guidance or research. In the meantime, the normal starting point for determining off-street parking provision is set out in the following paragraphs and tables. Where you are in doubt about which type of area a development falls into, you should discuss this with us and the planning authority at the earliest opportunity.
3.164 Parking provision should be considered in relation to any transport assessment and travel plan associated with a development proposal. Please refer to Section DG17.
3.165 Where you do not provide suitable parking arrangements within a development, we may refuse to adopt the development roads.
Off-street parking standards (excluding residential see 3.168)3.166 The normal maximum vehicular parking standards shown in Table DG11 below are taken from RPG8. For developments below the threshold, we will continue to apply the standards contained in the our previous guidance document Highway Requirements for Development (HRfD) for the time being as the normal maximum standards. In certain circumstances, for example, where there are road safety or amenity issues that cannot be satisfactorily resolved, we may require a higher level of parking provision.
Note: These standards will normally be applied in areas for which Leicestershire County Council is the highway authority. Other authorities have their own separate standards which will normally be allied for developments.
Leicester City Parking standards can be found at www.leicester.gov.uk
Nottinghamshire County Council parking standards can be found at www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/home/traffic_and_travel/strategy-policy/parkingpolicy.htm
(a) You should provide parking for people with disabilities as in paragraph 3.174 onwards.
(b) Please refer to paragraph 3.178 onwards for details on sizes of parking spaces and the design of car-park layouts.
(c) Please see paragraph 3.168 onwards for standards for residential parking.
(d) Please see paragraph 3.167 for developments below the thresholds shown or otherwise not listed.
(e) RPG8 defines Leicestershire urban towns as Oadby, Wigston, Hinckley, Earl Shilton, Barwell, Burbage, Loughborough and Shepshed. We will work with district councils to establish where within and around these towns the various levels of parking standards will specifically apply. It will also work with the district councils to agree standards for rural towns, which are not defined in RPG8.
(f) We will recommend that restrictions are imposed to prevent changes to B1 office use where no allowance has been made for the higher parking levels associated with offices.
(g) The figure for students relates to the total number of students rather than full-time equivalent figures.
(h) You should provide parking spaces for coaches in addition to the above, to be agreed for each specific site. Coach parking should be designed and managed so that it will not be used for car parking.
up to top | back to contents page
3.167 In Leicestershire, where no parking standard is given for a particular development (either in Table DG11 or in our previous document HRfD or in paragraph 3.171 for residential developments), we will consider the provision required taking certain factors into account including:
Note: Leicester City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council have their own separate standards which it will normally apply to developments in their areas where Leicestershire County Council is the highway authority.
3.168 The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) has recently published a research paper on residential car parking. It sets out a method for calculating total demand for parking for a proposed housing development based on a number of factors including:
Depending on the scale of your proposed development, we will normally expect you to apply this method.
3.169 Developments of 1 to 5 houses: You have the choice of either applying the following standards or using the DCLG paper method referred to in paragraph 3.168. (Please see paragraph 3.171 if you intend to use the DCLG method.)
3.170 Developments over 5 dwellings: We will normally expect you to apply the DCLG paper method.
3.171 Where you are using the DCLG paper method, we will normally expect you to provide your initial estimate of parking demand before you submit a planning application. We will also expect you to supply details of how that demand will be met, that is the mix of on-plot parking*, on-street parking and parking courts**. When you calculate parking demand, you should remember that the County of Leicestershire is both geographically and economically diverse, which can influence levels of car-ownership. It ranges from mainly rural areas such as Melton and Harborough, through former coal-mining areas in North West Leicestershire and Hinckley and Bosworth, to the more densely-developed suburbs of Leicester (Leicester itself being a separate unitary authority). Please see our website for 2001 Census data which provides information on car ownership across the County.
Notes:
*We will normally only consider counting garages as parking spaces where they meet the dimension requirements set out in paragraph 3.221.
**Experience with recent developments is that many residents make little or no use of parking courts. This results in wasteful use of land as well as on-street parking which the road layout has not been designed to accommodate. Where you are proposing a development that includes communal parking courts*, we would only consider a lower level of parking provision on the site where:
(*Note: A communal court is a parking area available for general use by residents and visitors in, for example, a development of flats. This guidance does not apply to a parking court allocated to an individual property or allocated parking spaces grouped together to serve several properties, such as rear parking courts that are becoming increasingly common in new developments.)
Figure DG15a May be prepared to consider a lower level parking provision
 Figure DG15b Reduced parking provision would not normally be considered
 3.172 For details of garage design and layout please refer to Section DG18, paragraph 3.219 onwards. Garages will not normally be counted as a parking space for the purpose of calculating parking provision, unless:
If a dwelling has no separate parking for cycles, it may affect whether we consider that the garage should be counted towards parking provision.
3.173 Where satisfactory levels of off-street parking are not provided, measures may be required in line with paragraph 3.189 onwards to minimise the risk of problems caused by on-street parking, including providing wider roads.
up to top | back to contents page
3.174 Many disabled people rely on the car for getting about. Whether they drive themselves or travel as a passenger, reaching their destination with ease is almost always determined by where the car can be parked. So it is very important that proper parking provision is made in new developments.
3.175 For all non-residential developments, you should provide disabled parking to the minimum standards shown in Table DG12. This provision should be in addition to general parking provision. Parking for disabled people should be located as close as possible to the main entrance of a building.
Table DG12: Minimum provision for disabled parking spaces (a)
(a) Please refer to paragraph 3.178 onwards for details on sizes of parking spaces and design of car park layouts.
3.176 You should monitor how reserved bays are used to make sure:
up to top | back to contents page
3.177 Servicing provision for various types of development are given in Table DG13.
Table DG13: Minimum servicing provision (a)
(a) Please refer to paragraph 3.178 onwards for details on sizes of parking spaces and design of car-park layouts.
up to top | back to contents page
3.178 Residential: Off-street parking areas should be close to the dwellings that they serve to make sure that they are fully used. This will minimise the possibility of on-street parking problems. Separate parking areas which are remote from some or all of the properties that they serve, and which cannot be easily observed, can result in on-street parking problems and also crime, anti-social behaviour and maintenance problems which discourage their use and affects the overall quality and appearance of a development.
3.179 You should involve us, the planning authority and the relevant police force Architechtural Liaison Officer (ALO) in finding parking solutions. But, as general guidance to avoid potential problems, remote parking areas should normally:
The location and overall design should encourage maximum use of the parking areas in order to minimise the risk of on-street parking problems.
3.180 You should consider the needs of people with mobility and visual impairments both in the layout of the parking area and any routes between it and the associated dwellings.
3.181 Industrial and commercial and other large-use car parks (for example for leisure and retail): We will not normally adopt off-street parking areas in these developments. However, your design should do the following.
3.182 You should also design such off-street parking areas to:
3.183 For more information about designing and locating disabled parking spaces, please consult Traffic Advisory Leaflet 5/95 Parking for Disabled and Building Regulations Part M (2004 Edition), particularly with regard to the design of any payment or ticket machines or car park access-control systems.
3.184 Minimum parking space sizes and aisle widths are shown in Figure DG16.
Figure DG16 Size and layout of parking spaces. Minimum parking space 2.4m x 5.5m
Lorry parking and loading bays - head-on and Lorry parking and loading bays - 45° for largest vehicles
up to top | back to contents page
3.185 Research we have carried out has shown that a main concern of Leicestershire residents is on-street parking. National research, including that by the New Homes Marketing Board and Halifax PLC, also highlights on-street parking as a real problem. Where on-street parking provision is poorly designed, it can:
Figure DG17 Examples of on-street parking problems
Parking causing vehicles to cross on to wrong side of the road
3.186 So, in the interests of the safety of all road users, including pedestrians and cyclists, and of maintaining efficient flow of traffic, we will look for developments that include well-designed parking layouts (on-street and off-street) that minimise the likelihood of on-street parking problems. For parallel parking to a road, each vehicle will normally need an area of about 2m wide x 6m long. For echelon (wedge shaped) parking and perpendicular (end on to the road) parking, individual bays should normally be indicated or marked. Bays should normally be about 2.4m wide and a minimum 4.8m long and they should be arranged so that drivers are encouraged to reverse into them. Figure DG18a shows some suggested on-street parking arrangements, and also sets- out how to calculate the necessary width needed to access echelon parking.
3.187 Where it appears that on-street parking could cause problems, we will ask you for computerised tracking assessments of appropriate vehicle paths (these are likely to include refuse lorries, pantechnicons, fire tenders and buses if the development is to be served by public transport). Where the assessment demonstrates that it is necessary to provide extra width to accommodate on-street parking, you should normally achieve this either by:
Figure DG18 Good examples of on-street parking bays
Figure DG18a Suggested on-street parking bays, parallel and perpendicular parking (top) and widening of carriageway to create on-street spaces (bottom). This Figure is based upon Figures 8.18 and 8.19 and paragraph 8.3.5.1 of the Manual for Streets. The Manual for Streets is copyright of the Department for Transport and Department of Communities and Local Government
.
 3.188 Where we adopt additional areas to accommodate on-street parking, you will have to pay commuted sums to cover future maintenance. Please see Part 4, Section MC18 for further details on our commuted sums policy.
3.189 You may also be required to provide measures to prevent parking in unsuitable areas and to make sure parking bays are used correctly. This might include providing bollards, fencing and landscaping. These should be integrated with the design of the overall development proposal and may also require the payment of commuted sums to cover their future maintenance. You may also need to adjust proposed building and plot layouts to avoid locating pedestrian accesses at points where they may cause problems if someone left their vehicle parked on-street while in the building.
3.190 In certain circumstances, traffic regulation orders may be needed to control on-street parking, including waiting restrictions and residents’ parking schemes either within the development or on the surrounding highway network. Where this is so, you will normally be required to pay all costs associated with making the orders. (Please also see Section DG9.)
up to top | back to contents page
3.191 Motorcycles and mopeds can provide an alternative to the private car for certain trips. There is a growth in the popularity of motorcycles and mopeds both for leisure and as a means of transport where public transport is limited and walking or cycling is unrealistic. If people switched from walking, cycling and public transport to riding motorcycles and mopeds, the environmental benefits would be less clear.
3.192 The parking standard for motorcycles and mopeds is:
3.193 Parking spaces should normally be:
3.194 The design of the parking area should allow motor cycles and mopeds to be secured to the ground while parked.
3.195 Parking provision should be considered in relation to any travel plan associated with a development proposal. Please refer to Section DG17.
3.196 As the Manual for Streets emphasizes, providing well-located, safe and secure cycle parking is a major factor in encouraging people to cycle as an alternative to using the private car. So, the parking standards in Table DG14 below are the normal minimum requirements.
Note: Leicester City’s parking standards can be found at www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council--services/ep/planning/plansandpolicy/localplan/writtenstatement/appendicescllp
3.197 Where it is not possible to provide cycle parking spaces on site, you will normally be expected to make a financial contribution towards providing public facilities where this provision is possible.
Table DG14: Minimum provision for cycle parking (a)
(a) Developments or circumstances not covered in the table will be assessed on a site-by-site basis.
(b) If cycle parking is not provided for residential developments, it may affect the way we consider the use of garages, i.e. whether they should count towards parking provision.
(c) If cycle parking is provided on upper floors, such as in flats, lifts that can take bikes should be provided.
3.198 All cycle parking must:
3.199 Normally you should provide Sheffield stands as illustrated in Figure DG19 below. Stands that grip only the front wheel do not provide adequate support or security. When placed 1m apart and 0.5m from the wall, Sheffield stands can accommodate two bicycles. Where more than two stands are required, you may need to provide a ‘toast rack’ facility.
Figure DG19 Sheffield stand - inset 'toast rack' type. Sheffield stands can accommodate two cycles provided that stands are placed 1m apart and at least 500mm from any wall.
 3.200 Parking provision should be considered in relation to any travel plan associated with a development proposal. Please refer to Section DG17.
3.201 Please refer to Traffic Advisory Leaflet 5/02 for further information on cycle parking.
up to top | back to contents page
3.202 You should not consider vehicle, motor cycle or cycle parking provision in isolation from travel plans. The level and design of on-site parking and any proposed travel plan measures should reflect and complement each other. The County Council is currently developing its own guidance on preparing travel plans. In the meantime, you can find some interim guidance in the Transport Assessment Guidelines in Part 7, appendix C.
3.203 For employment developments and other developments where travel plans are required, we will normally expect the development to include complementary facilities for motorcyclist and cyclists, for example, secure lockers (for storing clothes, and so on), showers and changing rooms.
3.204 This section provides design guidance on private drives and areas. For guidance on the Advance Payments Code (APC), please see Part 5, Section ANR2.
3.205 For developments of more than five dwellings, we will encourage developers to create, whenever possible, ‘road’ layouts that are to an adoptable standard and that will be offered for adoption. We will not normally adopt developments of five or less dwellings.
3.206 For developments of six or more dwellings, you should remember the implications both for yourself and house purchasers if we do not adopt the roads, for example:
Poorly-maintained private areas can also detract from the quality and appearance of a development.
3.207 Private developments should normally be in the form of a cul-de-sac. You should try to avoid private ‘through’ routes as they are more likely to be used by the general public, possibly adding to the liabilities and future problems for residents.
3.208 For private developments of six dwellings or more, we will normally serve a notice on you with an assessment of the cost of the proposed roadworks under the Advance Payment Code (APC), to protect frontagers’ interests. The cost of this will reflect the cost of the proposed street works and you should construct the works to an appropriate standard. However, because APCs have been served and money has been paid or retained, we are not indicating any future intention to adopt and maintain the street works at public expense. Please see Part 5, Section ANR2 for more information.
*Note: The indemnity should normally be a legal covenant placed on the properties to prevent petitioning. We must approve the wording of the covenant.
up to top | back to contents page
3.210 Note: in all cases, the proposed development and its location must be acceptable to us in principle and highway safety must not be reduced.
On roads with a speed limit of 40mph or higher, or where vehicle speeds are more than 40mph:
For all roads where the speed limit or recorded vehicle speeds is less than 40mph, even where you can demonstrate that you cannot achieve any form of adoptable layout or you do not want your development roads to be adopted (despite the implications in paragraph 3.206 above), you must still design the site access point to make sure that it does not affect the safety and efficient functioning of the highway or otherwise affect road users. (It will normally need to be designed in accordance with the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges or other standard acceptable to us.) Please see appendix E (for additional information on private areas).
For private developments of six dwellings or more, we will normally serve a notice on you with an assessment of the cost of the proposed roadworks under the Advance Payments Code (APC), to protect frontagers' interests. Please see Part 5, section ANR2 for more information.
3.211 You should provide the site access point in line with either Figure DG20 or Figure DG21, depending on the scale of the development. Also depending on the scale of the development, you will need to obtain our specific approval for the construction details of the access. The access will only be acceptable if you have a maintenance agreement planned or in place.
Figure DG20 Unadopted shared drive serving up to 25 dwellings
(a) If the driveway length is more than 25m, its minimum width should be 5m (plus any widening where bounded by walls) to enable access by refuse vehicles
Figure DG21 Unadopted shared drive serving more than 25 dwellings
3.212 On busy roads (generally with peak-hour traffic flows of more than 300 vehicles an hour), any gates should be set back at least 5m from the highway boundary and should open inwards only.
3.213 If you cannot achieve layouts to Figure DG20 and Figure DG21 we may recommend refusal of your proposals on grounds of safety or dangers to the public, as appropriate.
up to top | back to contents page
3.214 Even if a road is not to be adopted you should still seek to make sure that:
Turning facilities will be required:
Elsewhere, turning facilities will not normally be required unless road safety would be compromised.
Figure DG22 Private drive turning facilities - typical layout
 3.215 For long drives and accesses, you should consult BS5906, 2005, which sets out maximum carry distances of 25m for refuse collection. Where this distance is exceeded, the British Standard recommends:
The layout of the development should include measures to make sure that parked vehicles do not stop the use of any turning heads. Where ‘wheelie bin’ collection methods are used, you should consider providing a communal collection point within the site, close to the highway.
3.216 Where a development is situated more than 45m from the highway, you must cater for emergency vehicles by constructing the drive and any turning areas so they can cater for a commercial or service vehicle. The minimum width for access should be at least 3.7m (between kerbs) and fire vehicles should not have to reverse more than 20m. Your development must be in line with British Standard BS5906, 2005 and Building Regulations Approved Document B, Fire Safety 2006. You should also take into account the comments about parking in paragraph 3.215.
3.217 You should also follow the general guidance contained in this part of the document on personal safety and designing-out crime, and you should ask the relevant police force 'Architectural Liaison Officer', the planning authority and us for guidance on proposals for specific sites. You should also make sure that you take into account the needs of people with impaired mobility.
3.218 The construction standards for drives serving up to and including 5 dwellings should normally be in accordance with that for footway vehicular and field accesses as shown in standard drawing SD/11/5A. Standard Drawings. In other cases, they should normally be in line with Table DG15. (Contact us for permeable pavement design.)
Key
CGM = Close graded macadam DBM = Dense bitumen macadam 3.219 On plot garages to individual properties should be located so:
without the cars obstructing the highway, including any footway or turning facilities.
3.220 In the interests of urban design, garages should not dominate the street scene. Where an integral garage is proposed (that is, it is part of the house), you should hold early discussions with the planning authority on the design of the garage, the house and elevation of the property. The Manual for Streets suggests that keeping garages and parking areas level with the main building line can be beneficial to the townscape, but, a planning authority may require garages to be located behind houses and may not encourage integral garages.
Table DG16: Garage set-back distances
Where an access is to be gated, the gates should be set back 5m where they open inward and 6m where they open outwards. This is to ensure that the public highway (particularly areas used by pedestrians) is not obstructed if a vehicle is parked on the access in front of the gates.
3.221 Garages should preferably have the following minimum internal dimensions.
If a dwelling has no separate parking for cycles, it may affect whether we consider that the garage should be counted towards parking provision.
up to top | back to contents page
3.222 This section provides design guidance on private drives and areas. Separate guidance is currently being prepared to cover procedures for serving and paying monies under the Advance Payment Code.
3.223 For multiple-building, multiple-occupation developments (developments occupied by more than one company) we will encourage you to provide road layouts that are to an adoptable standard and offer them for adoption whenever possible. We will not normally adopt single-occupancy developments.
3.224 Except for exempted developments, we will serve notice under the Advance Payment Code (APC) for all industrial and commercial developments to protect frontagers’ interests. The cost of this will reflect the cost of the proposed street works and you should construct the works to an appropriate standard. However, because APCs have been served and money has been paid or retained, we are not indicating any future intention to adopt and maintain the street works at public expense. The requirements of paragraph 3.209 may also apply.
3.225 Even where you can demonstrate that you cannot achieve a form of adoptable layout or you do not want your development roads to be adopted, you should still design the site access point to make sure that it does not affect the safety and efficient functioning of the highway or otherwise affect road users.
3.226 You should normally design site access in line with the appropriate parts of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and our Specification and standard drawings, unless the road to which your development connects falls within the definition of a road (street) as set out in appendix L.
3.227 Office developments (use class B1) up to 3000m2 gross floor area (GFA) may be served by a dropped-kerb access arrangement as shown in Figure DG23. However, if you choose this option, you should note that we will recommend imposing planning conditions that restrict any change of use to general employment (use class B2 to B8). Depending on the scale of the development, you will need to obtain our specific approval for the construction details of the access.
Figure DG23 Unadopted access serving up to 3000m2 (GFA) of offices
3.228 Regardless of the access type, you should provide separate footways or pedestrian routes within the site to minimise the safety risks of pedestrians coming into contact with HGVs. This could be in the form of footways or routes marked on the ground and segregated by bollards or railings.
3.229 Where any gates are to be provided, they should open inwards and be set back a distance appropriate to the type of vehicle likely to require access to the development.
up to top | back to contents page
3.230 Even if a road is not to be adopted you should still seek to make sure that:
3.231 You must also take into account the requirements of BS5906 2005 and Building Regulations Approved Document B, Fire Safety 2006, with regard to access for refuse collection and emergency vehicles (see paragraphs 3.215 and 3.216). You should design and construct any turning areas within 50m of the access junction to the adoptable design guidance to minimise the risk of vehicles having to reverse out of the development on to the public highway. The layout of the development should include measures to make sure that parked vehicles do not reduce the use of any turning heads or areas.
3.232 You should also follow the various general guidance contained in this part of the document on personal safety and designing-out crime, and you should seek guidance from the relevant police force 'Architectural Liaison Officer' on proposals for specific sites. You should also make sure that you take into account the needs of people with impaired mobility. For car parking areas, you should follow the guidance in Section DG14.
3.233 Wherever the extent of the adoptable highway is not clear – for example there is no wall, fence, or footway edge – you must install an agreed form of boundary marking.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
